Blog Smith is inspired by the myth of Hephaestus in the creation of blacksmith-like, forged materials: ideas. This blog analyzes topics that interest me: IT, politics, technology, history, education, music, and the history of religions.
Graphic source: AP Photo/Jae C. Hong
Another state and not just in Ohio are there instances of voter fraud by Obama supporters in ACORN. A Nevada secretary of state's office spokesman said that investigators are looking for evidence of voter fraud at the office.
I am going to have to weigh in on the Obama Children's Chorus which is just creepy. And, if no one sees the parallels, they need to be reminded of what happens when you capture the youth in song.
Oh, ok, pot, booze, and blow are fine but the other guy is erratic: just checking.
Graphic source: The Long War Journal
If the Uighers, Chinese Muslims, who are facing possible release, enter the U.S. we should be aware of what we are dealing with. The Muslims were captured in terrorist training camps as a fall-out of the search for al Qaeda after 9/11.
The Uighers who may be released are all connected to the most lethal of the Uighur groups to evolve out of the Soviet jihad called the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM). Their near enemy is obviously China but no one can say for sure they these jihadists don't view the U.S. as the far enemy. The ETIM are international jihadists who share their ideology with al Qaeda and the Taliban. The swath of insurgency from various groups stretched from Western China through Central Asia.
The organization and related Uighur terrorist groups have been designated by the UN as one of the terrorist groups affiliated with the Taliban and al Qaeda; The US Treasury Department and the US Department of Homeland Security have also designated the ETIM a terrorist organization.
The Department of Defense has released unclassified documents produced at Gitmo for the Uighurs thus far incarcerated. The documents were produced during the detainee’s hearings before their Combatant Status Review Tribunals (“CSRT”) and Administrative Review Boards (“ARB”) between 2004 and 2006. All 22 of the Uighurs are alleged to have demonstrable ties to the ETIM and/or its sister organization the Sharq (East) Turkistan Islamic Partiyisa (STIP). All of the detainees were either: (a) identified as members of the ETIM and STIP and/or (b) received training at ETIM facilities and/or (c) resided at ETIM guesthouses or training facilities.
These are not people who should be released into any American's backyard.
Graphic source: Wikipedia Commons
With age discrimination so rampant in this presidential campaign it may be instructive to recall how other countries have handled the age issue of their leaders. Golda Meir was 76 when she ended her term as Prime Minister in Israel; French President Charles de Gaulle was 78, and Nelson Mandela as President in South Africa was 80. Mandela also was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993.
In a `you had to be there' moment from an earlier campaign, when Ronald Reagan was 73 he ran for re-election and in a 1984 televised debate against Walter Mondale, then 56, Reagan quipped: "I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I will not hold my opponent's youth and inexperience against him." The audience laughed and Reagan won the election.
Graphic source: Afpax Insider
Two Chinese engineers kidnapped 29 August appeared on a video released by the Taliban. They pleaded for their release.
The candidates are spending quite a bit of time, if they talk about the situation at all, discussing Iraq as if it were 2003. A heads-up Senators, it is 2008.
Obama says that Iraq is wrong-headed and expensive but we were wrong to go there; yet, we should insert ourselves in Africa as a humanitarian gesture to stop human suffering. Moreover, we should enforce a no-fly zone as well. Uhh, Senator, this was the original policy in Iraq. Where have you been?
And, while on the topic of fixing other country's problems, aren't we broke as a nation? Didn't we just bail out Wall Street to the tune of $700 Billion? So, we should not support Iraq, in fact, we should set a timetable and get out because that is what Bush wanted. Yet, we should get out and go elsewhere? We should now go to Africa and extend ourselves there? Uhh, Senator, where have you been? We did this in Somalia, as a humanitarian gesture, and our troops were attacked. We left.
I know the words sound good but a greater grasp of the actual conditions and a review of what the U.S. has already tried would be instructive.
1) Break the rules and don't follow the time limits of what you agreed to while the American people are desperately seeking answers to the questions that concern them most;
2) Don't directly answer the questions of those Americans asking the questions.
If you follow number one and two listed above you are not qualified to be the next President. This is my disappointment with the second debate in the town hall round.
Unfortunately, these are the only two viable candidates available but neither McCain nor Obama followed the time rules that their campaigns agreed to nor did either candidate answer the questions they were asked. We know what we are in for: people who break the rules as they see fit and don't have answers to our questions.
At the same time, did you notice the voters? If there ever was a more subdued, concerned, and somber audience at a political event I have not seen it. The body language of the audience members transcended the cold screen of television. And, their revulsion reflects the general mood of Americans. These are dark days for the Republic.
Graphic source: Cotswolds.info.com
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."
Sir Winston Churchill
Graphic source: AfPax Insider
The Taliban are back at it again and they have reconstituted a Spinkai Ragzai, South Waziristan camp that trains boys seven to fourteen years old to be suicide bombers. A video obtained AfPax Insider shows a camp maintained by Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud. The illustrations show the boys reading from the Quran with an adult Taliban training them. One slide shows a poster board with the words “Killing a Spy” written in English. The Pakistani army destroyed the camp previously and the computers, equipment, and training literature showed graphic details of the training ‘nursery.’ Young boys are seen carrying out executions, a classroom where 10- to 12-year olds are sitting in formations, with a white band of Quranic verses wrapped around their forehead, and there are training videos to show how improvised explosive devices are made and detonated.
The Spinkai camp is one of 157 training camps and more than 400 support locations in the Taliban-controlled tribal areas and in the Northwest Frontier Province.
Palfrey was asked questions and I posted his answer below:
Which findings in the book were most surprising to you? I didn't find as many young people taking advantage of doing everything they could do with technology. I didn't see the outpouring of creativity I was hoping to see.
I wanted to see that the technology was a gateway to get more young people involved in civic life. I didn't find a huge rush to use these technologies to improve the world. There are examples of incredible social entrepreneurs … but there is not a large-scale rush, which I was hoping to see.
This is a quick and easy read but one to stir up controversy if you follow his argument. There are not many people willing to take a positive view of the neocons, since currently they are regularly lampooned publicly, nor many who would dare say that Bush is right on foreign policy but Podhoretz is one such person who will. The closest analogy to Bush he argues is Truman in 1947 who unpopularly enunciated his Doctrine of containment against the Soviets. Eisenhower although differing in many ways did not alter the Truman Doctrine. Podhoretz argues that the Bush Doctrine of preemptive action against our enemies is correct and will be proven true historically.
This request may be a two-tiered NATO alliance that U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned against early this year but there is no alternative. The Europeans are going to be hit harder, and most likely before the U.S. next gets attacked by terrorists trained in Afpak camps so they should be willing to pay for their own defense. Gates has been on the frontlines asking U.S. allies to pay for their defense, especially if they are not willing to send troops.
The U.S. has 33,000 troops in Afghanistan. About 22,000 are part of NATO's force of nearly 48,000 troops. The United States contributes the most troops by far among allies, followed by Britain with about 8,000.
The Afghan army plans to double in size to 134,000 soldiers over five years at a cost of $17 billion to $20 billion, according to estimates.
Here is the tally at the trough:
McCain received $19.6 million and Obama garnished $22.5 million.
Two of the biggest financial groups in Washington, the Financial Services Roundtable and the Mortgage Bankers Association, have been holding meetings with McCain and Obama’s economic advisers. They are working to shift their bad debt to taxpayers. The Roundtable has met in private, closed-door sessions with Obama economic advisers Ian Soloman and McCain adviser Ike Brannon. Those lurking around Obama—-economists such as Paul Volcker, Robert Rubin, Lawrence Summers, and Laura Tyson-—are as guilty of dismantling of government regulation as those advising McCain.
I say a pox on both their houses.
On the other hand, Andrew Jackson nearly brought about the collapse of the Second Bank of the United States when he refused to deposit tax revenues in it. The collapse of the bank was an important cause of the Panic of 1837 in which the next president, Martin van Buren, refused to involve the government. This event was a harbringer of the Great Depression.
Thus far, the score is 1-1.
The next disaster was in savings and loans during the 1980s and 1990s. The crisis was caused by institutions lending good money after bad, then getting slammed by rising interest rates. Fraud was also a big factor. The government set up the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) to regulate hundreds of failed S&Ls and try to sell their assets. The taxpayers received back about 80% on the dollar. This one was largely a success.
Then there was the issue in 2001 when the airline industry faced collapse after 9/11. Carriers faced a money crunch when a flying ban was imposed and people were afraid to fly. The government provided compensation. But once flights resumed, the airlines could not get credit. The government set up the Air Transport Stabilization Board to provide up to $10bn in loan guarantees. The government received shares in the airlines in return for guaranteeing loans to them and also charged fees for participating in the scheme. Taxpayers eventually made a profit of $300m. The weaker carriers lost out, such as United Airlines, which was forced into bankruptcy, but most of them survived. Thus, the carrier bail-out largely succeeded.
Most of the bailouts seem to work, basically 3-1 as in this scenario, but what concerns me is the frequency. If the government has to bailout companies, half of the bailouts occurring since the '80s, how vibrant can that economy be?
I have two questions: why should the problems of former enemy combatants concern me? And, how did they become former combatants in the first place?
The answer to the latter question is time. Their attorneys argue that the men have been confined for too long. The attornies say authorities could supervise them much as they monitor criminal defendants released pending trial. Yes, I suppose it is a reasonable argument that Washington D.C. is a particularly crimeless area. I wonder if the Judge might like to have the former enemy combatants next door since he was intrigued by the question of release.
How these individuals become enemy combatants is clearer. In 2001, most of the Uighurs now in Guantanamo Bay were living in camps in Afghanistan until U.S. airstrikes drove them into neighboring Pakistan. They were captured there and turned over to U.S. authorities. It is likely then that most of these people were receiving terrorist training and have been biding their time in prison in preparation. Prisons in Britain and Iraq are leading places of terrorist training and development.
The two options that are presented, release into the Homeland, or continued incarceration are the only two choices offered by attorney's on behalf of the Uighurs.
However, I see no reason why Americans should be welcoming individuals who were found in Afghani camps in 2001. Yet, a Supreme Court ruling in June gave camp dwellers the right to have their cases reviewed by federal judges under the legal doctrine of habeas corpus. U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon has been conducting closed-door hearings. There are six Algerians who were picked up in Bosnia in late 2001. The only way to block the continued incarceration or release is evidence that the incarcerated received terrorist training. The Justice Department is expected to make the same argument for the other detainees. The government has asserted that the Uighurs were members of the East Turkistan Islamic Movement and trained at camps affiliated with the Taliban or al-Qaeda. The Bush administration designated ETIM a terrorist organization in August 2002, after the Uighurs were taken into custody.
One academic sees no other alternative than the two options proposed: "It boils down to: either you keep these people in prison at Guantanamo Bay for the rest of their lives or you release them into the United States," said Donald E. Wilkes Jr., a professor at the University of Georgia Law School and an authority on habeas corpus rights.
I see no reason why the U.S. should harbor not only the poor and the tired yearning to be free but those training at terrorist camps while providing rights of habeus corpus to them as well. If there is no reason to hold them, then release them back to China or anywhere so it is not a problem for people in the United States. They voluntarily left their own country for Afghanistan so another move, elsewhere, should not bother them now.
In a deal struck last Monday with the assistance of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Citigroup had offered to take over Wachovia's banking operations for $2.2 billion.
The battle also has implications for taxpayers.
If Citigroup is successful in its takeover, taxpayers will pay more because of a FDIC offer. Citigroup has the support of industry regulators, and the FDIC stands behind its previously announced agreement with Citigroup, according to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman Sheila Bairwhich who promised to cover any losses on Wachovia's $300 billion loan portfolio beyond the first $42 billion. The Wells offer does not ask for FDIC assistance.
Wachovia spokeswoman Christy Phillips-Brown stated the company believes its agreement with Wells Fargo is "proper, valid and ... in the best interest of shareholders, employees, and the American taxpayers," the Associated Press reported.
Seems so to me too; I'm a taxpayer.
The Obama camp has tried to downplay the relationship between the terrorists and Obama but that story is sketchy. The University of Illinois at Chicago has released hundreds of documents that solidify the relationship between the two. There are more than 50,000 documents, 128 boxes, and 946 files. The University archives on the pair comes out to 70 linear feet. This is no casual connection.
Ayers was a member of the Weather Underground, a radical group that claimed responsibility for a series of bombings, including nonfatal explosions at the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol, preceding the foreign terrorism problem by many years.
Ayers was a fugitive for years with his wife, fellow radical Bernadine Dohrn, Dohrn is now a professor at Northwestern University Law School. But after surrendering in 1980, the charges against Ayers were dropped because of prosecutorial misconduct. He got off on a technicality we might say.
Moreover, Obama and Ayers both live in the same Hyde Park neighborhood. They served together on the board of a Chicago charity, and in the mid-1990s when Obama first ran for office, Ayers hosted a meet-the-candidate session for Obama at his home. They are more than casual acquaintances, Obama and Ayers share a political ideology.
For a candidate who champions his better judgement over his opponent, Ayers is a curious political supporter to have. Ayers has not denied that he set off bombs and he is on the record that U.S. Marines are terrorists. All John Kerry did was toss a few medals over the White House fence, Ayers threw bombs that exploded. This is the support that Obama has elicited.
Let us take a glance at Egypt, a nation with a heavy cash-based economy and relatively nascent set of financial tools, which should, in theory, provide haven from the “credit freeze” afflicting developed markets. Nonetheless, if not passed even in Egypt a financial crisis might occur, not without reason is this period best described as “global.” For with every advance in online communication, trading, banking and asset management, the flow of capital from one state to another is eased. In fact, the problem for Egypt and other foreign markets is that when outsiders panic, they aren’t just yanking cash out of their own markets, they disinvest elsewhere also.
The odd thing of course is that Candidate A is running against Candidate B--supposedly--yet both candidates come running to vote in support with the President, I suppose I should describe him as President B, further, the bailout was supported by all three and the Treasury Secretary and Federal Reserve Chairman. It seems like just about everyone favors the bill.
But wait, did the American taxpayers? Well, no, polls last week showed that less than 3 in 10 Americans supported the bailout.
I guess they don't count in this financial lovefeast between President B, Candidate A, and Candidate B.
At one time Republicans would have viewed the bailout as an abandonement of their small-government, free-market ideology that was once the cornerstone of their party’s economic ethos. Democrats at one time would not have wanted to use the little person's money to rescue the big money Wall Street megalomaniacs who drove the economy into the current mess in the first place. No more I take it.
Oh yes, and where does the bailout leave Egypt? Left to its out devices, the Egyptian economy is weak. Because of Egypt’s high poverty rates, and record inflation, Moody’s Investor Service lowered their rating on Egypt’s foreign currency country ceilings for bonds and bank deposits from stable to negative and downgraded the government’s local currency bond rating in July.
And as the past few weeks have shown, each bank collapse or whisper of impending economic chaos in the U.S. ties up nervous American investors-—a primary source of investment in Egypt—-who pull out of emerging markets as they try to recoup losses at home.
Egypt was bracing for Eid El-Fitr, which is a Muslim holiday that marks the end of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting, and Armed Forces Day, so the American setback would be delayed in Egypt. But, once markets re-open on 7 October, Egyptians can rejoice, Candidates A, B, and President B, along with the U.S. Congress, as well as the financial tentacles of the U.S. government, will have helped them.
Only the American taxpayer will suffer from the bailout.
I'll admit it, this was a book I did not get around to reading at first because of its style and a misunderstanding of the book's purpose. The style of the book is difficult in that it is a series of excerpts, often overlapping, of diverse sources. The players are difficult to keep track of, but they need to be introduced time after time. Thus, we are constantly being reminded of who was bin Laden's bodyguard, which player this guy is, and how they fit into the organization.
Despite its limitations, the book is a fascinating read, and excerpted by those who knew or met bin Laden personally throughout the years. Where else are you going to find detailed information such as in one visitor to bin Laden's hangout, two of bin Laden's sons were playing Nintendo while hiding out with their infamous father?
But most importantly, Bergen is one of those rare journalists who allows bin Laden to be bin Laden, without the distortions or biases built in many other sources. Although the book suffers from a lack of cogent analysis, and that has been done elsewhere by Michael Scheuer particularly, Bergen's work is valuable read in that an accurate oral history emerges from the text to reveal a bin Laden who is unremarkable in some respects, absolutely lethal, and a worthy adversary of the U.S. In addition, since he is engaged in religious war, and a typical product of Islam, the West should realize that more bin Laden's are going to follow his lead, regardless of the presence of Al-Qaeda, or the life of bin Laden.
Graphic source: The Long War Journal
I wonder what it is about our nominees, and our journalists, who can not state the obvious. In the Vice-Presidential debate, Biden made a point that he thinks the Iraqis should provide for their own defense. Well Joe, just because the mainstream media does not cover this material, and the politicians do not want to recognize success in the field, does not make it so. Readers of this blog are kept up to date every month by the excellent field reports available. As of September 1st, Anbar Province became the eleventh of eighteen Iraqi provinces to revert to Provincial Iraqi Control (PIC). Doesn't Biden know this? Why can't the commentator call him to task for such a obvious gaffe. Even CNN, which puts much stock in fact-checking failed to correct this obvious mistake. I suppose after an election victory this would allow Obamaden to claim they are the architects of victory and withdrawal. It ain't so, Joe. The surge has been working and our military have done a stellar job in Iraq.
Graphic source: Pajamas Media
A Humvee interior view of the passenger side door shows how a copper projectile ripped violently through the door, fragmenting the interior door armor and causing significant damage before exiting though the dashboard. This is a typical Iranian-made EFP causing U.S. casualties.
Regardless of any analysis, it is quite embarrassing to hear two people running to be second-fiddle to the Commander-in-Chief not even mention the blood and sacrifice spilled by American troops. Instead, both vice-presidential nominees hid behind the skirt of defending Israel rather than take Iran to task for supplying weapons to kill American troops. It is just despicable. Let Israel take care of their own issues, and we can remain a solid ally as needed, but for God's sake, defend our troops.
Despite abundant evidence outside the mainstream media, in the debate tonight neither candidate mentioned Iran's role in killing our people. Coalition forces have documented how Iran supplys Sunni and Shia insurgents with deadly munitions in the form of explosively formed penetrators, or EFPs.
Their blood and sacrifice is worth more than silence.
Hizb ut-Tahrir Pakistan, an international Islamist group which aims to set up a Caliphate or Khilafat, a trans-national Islamic state, has announced a campaign urging Pakistan to deploy nuclear weapons if the US continues to violate Pakistan’s territorial integrity. Previously, the group asked Pakistan to attack US bases in Bagram and Doha with nuclear weapons and suggested all of Pakistan's 160 million citizens conduct martyrdom operations. In the latest statement the group states:
Deploy nuclear weapons all over Pakistan and warn the crusaders and their allies of a stern response should they persist in their violation of Pakistan’s territorial integrity. This maneuver will not weaken Pakistan. On the contrary it will bolster the country’s ability to effectively counter regional and international threats. If a small nuclear country like North Korea’s can spurn US advances, then Pakistan, a far stronger nuclear power with the seventh largest army in the world, is in a far better position to accomplish much more.
Who Am I?
I am Teddy Roosevelt in 1900.
Attorney General Lisa Madigan, a Democrat who is supporting Obama's presidential bid, is investigating "whether this charitable organization properly used its charitable assets, including the state funds it received," according to Sun-Times article.
Obama vowed to "work tirelessly" to turn the lot into an oasis; today the garden site is a mess of weeds, chunks of concrete, and garbage.
Let the Obama Campaign respond I say (Cf. http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/07/suntimes_probe_as_state_senato.html).
In an official response the Campaign stated that Obama worked with the Chicago Better Housing Association, a non-profit that received funding from Fannie Mae, and the Citigroup Foundation.
A further tie to the discredited Fannie Mae program and the Sharia affiliated Citigroup is supposed to reassure us?
Former Secretary of Commerce William Daley, Mayor Daley's brother, Daley has been a lobbyist for the discredited Fannie Mae program that led to the economic crisis.
Former Secretary of Transportation and Secretary of Energy Federico Pena who assisted Enron. Former Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay asked Clinton to propose a power deregulation bill to forestall legislation promoting competition and consumer choice in electricity. Lay wrote the letter at Pena's urging. Internal Enron documents show Secretary Pena gave Lay key information about "key contacts from important constituents" who could pressure President Clinton.
Penny Pritzker lost her family bank to the FDIC when federal regulators cited "poor oversight by [Superior Bank's] board" when it chose to shut it down.
No wonder Obama favors the failed bailout bid.
How I would like to know, could she claim that the book was "sacred history?" Was she speaking as a detached, secular, scientific observer? She was further quoted as saying the work was "softcore pornography." Spellberg said: "I felt it my duty to warn the press of the novel's potential to provoke anger among some Muslims. London-based cleric Anjem Choudhary has called the book an insult to the Prophet's honour, and thus warrants a "death penalty" under Sharia law. Goodness, we wouldn't expect Muslims to conduct themselves properly in a diverse, secular setting now would we? Spellberg further stated: "When combined with falsification of the Islamic past, it exploits Americans who know nothing about Aisha or her seventh century world." Thank you for looking after my reading habits and noting my ignorance professor.
Moreover, Spellberg then continued into areas fields further outside her academic expertise, she teaches the history of the Middle East and Gender in Islamic History, and was quoted as stating that the novel constituted a "declaration of war" and "a national security issue."
The author Sherry Jones has called on Professor Spellberg to retract her comments.
Spellberg has published an academic study of Aisha's life called Politics, Gender and the Islamic Past: The Legacy of Aisha bint Abi Bakr; she is currently on leave.
Graphic source: AP
As the West begins to cower before Islamic censorship, the novel Jewel of Medina may not be published in Britain. The Random House publisher of the work, Martin Rynja, had his London house firebombed which provoked the cancelling of the publisher's right to a free press. Author Sherry Jones has called on freedom loving people to protest the indefinite postponent of the work. The book fictionalizes the life of one of the prophet Mohammed’s wives, Aisha.
Despite the London action, the American publisher, Beaufort Books, will publish the book on 15 October.
Video source: The Times Online
A 15 year-old teenage girl, handcuffed to an iron railing, patiently waits as an Iraqi explosives expert cuts the trigger cords on a suicide vest strapped to her body.
The footage originates from an August incident when police found Rania Ibrahim Mutlib in a side road in Baquba, north of Baghdad, having failed to detonate her charge. The girl claimed that she had been drugged and did not wish to become the 16th teenage girl bomber said to have struck in the past year. Her husband, Mohammed Hussein Mohammed Sameet, 24-years-old, bade her farewell as she dressed that morning. Police have been given metal detectors to scan women because women would pass through checkpoints without being searched since Islam forbids a man to frisk a woman. Young girls are the perfect weapon.
"How can you run when you know?"
"Ohio," lyrics by Neil Young
As the bailout fiasco continues, the Democrats in Congress managed to attach funds in the bill for Acorn which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. Among their many activities is to organize voter registration efforts for the Democratic Party. In 2006 their efforts registered 1,800 new voters in Washington but only six were later verified as authentic. Yet, the same organization has been involved in similar nonsense in the swing states of Missouri, Michigan, and Colorado, in addition to Washington and Ohio. Moreover, the New York Times reported that the group misappropriated funds.
Who else would such an organization attract but of course Barack Obama during his community organizing. He trained Acorn staff and later the Democratic nominee funneled money to the group through the Woods Fund, on whose board he sat, and through the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
During this organization, Acorn promoted non-credit-worthy borrowers and now taxpayers are expected to foot the bill for the failing lending companies.
Why not just put our collective feet down, on Acorn and their crony?
But, there is more.
The likelihood of fraud is greater than ever in this election year.
Ordinarily, ballots are safeguarded with representatives from major parties who overlook the voting process. Not this year in Ohio.
A lawsuit by GOP-backed voters was dismissed against the Democratic secretary of state, Jennifer Brunner, and her interpretation of Ohio's absentee voting law. Ohio changed its election law in 2005 to allow any registered voter to cast an absentee ballot, beginning Sept. 30. The deadline for registering isn't until Oct. 6, so Brunner ruled there is a six-day window in which voters can register and vote at the same time.
In Ohio there are no safeguards, no validation of ballots, no oversight. Obama learned his Chicago style politics well: `vote early, vote often.' To quote the Who: "Here comes the new boss, same as the old boss."
The economic factor plays an important role in the debate. Department of Energy statistics indicate that 17% U.S. crude oil imports now come from Africa, more than the United States gets from Persian Gulf countries. However, China is a looming presence in Africa and counter-balances American influence.
Is the U.S. willing to open up a third front in the war on terror? We are already stymied on two fronts. Is the U.S. willing to cozy up to more repressive regimes in order to extend our dependence on foreign oil? Many Africans would think so. And finally, has the U.S. already been beaten to the punch since China preceded the U.S. as an important presence on the Continent?
Anyone for the Sons of Afghanistan?
"I think his greatness is that he keeps trying to come back to service without ever asking people to cut him any slack or feel sorry for him or any of that stuff because he was a POW."
Bill knows a great possible President when he sees one, it takes one to know one.
Kissinger stated that he is not in favor of negotiations with Iran at the presidential level. He stated: "Sen. McCain is right. I would not recommend the next president of the United States engage in talks with Iran at the presidential level." Kissinger does not agree with McCain in all matters but he is right on Iran according to Kissinger.
Obama is embarrassing this country.
Hussain stated: "Senator McCain came across as more thoughtful with a better understanding of the situation in Pakistan's frontier regions, which he has visited, and he got it right when he said that we have to win the support of the people rather than threaten them with military strikes."
One thing strikes me, what is obvious to Pakistanis, is something that American independent voters fail to grasp.
What we can not agree to though, is something that weaker countries, allow for: unrestricted, and non-conditional talks. It should be obvious to the Pakistanis, and if the Islamabad bombing is not a message, I don't know what else could be, is that you can not sit down at the same table with people who want to kill you.
The debate hurt McCain more since he needed a knockout punch if he expected to pick up much needed votes. Also, it is difficult to evaluate the visible but hard to interpret reaction line that ran beneath the screen, consisting of Democrats, Republicans, and critically important Independents, but I would guesstimate that the Independents found Obama's words and promises more appealing.
On the other hand, several comments are in order. The issues of the economy seemed to have stumped Obama. When asked directly if he favored the proposed $700 billion dollar bailout, he waffled. Then, as a follow-up, when asked what he would cut since he identified not everything can be funded and some projects would need to be delayed, he again seem mystified. We are in dire financal straits but Obama went on to list more programs that he favored and would pay for, treasured Great Society programs such as education and food for poor children. Obama doesn't get it. He is not LBJ. We don't have that federal largesse any more. At one point McCain noted that Obama is the furthest from center candidate ever nominated by either major party. On the other hand, McCain stated his position bluntly. He would pay for defense, care for our veterans, and veto spending bills to reign in the free-spending government. In a time of fiscal crisis, which guideline might work? The French before the Revolution fell into a tailspin during war time yet they continued to fund extravagant projects.
In addition, McCain has been there. During any questions that involved how would you handle such and such international crisis or war effort, McCain was able to deftly respond, I've been there, I know the particulars and the players, and this is what I would do. Obama was left flailing on the ropes. He is embarrassingly out of his league in experience and international affairs, and the global situation is more dangerous today than it ever was during the Cold War. He is not prepared to handle an international crisis.
On the specific issues of war, Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama is running against the ghost of George Bush circa 2003. It is not 2003; it is 2008 and the surge worked in Iraq, and the military can apply the lessons learned there to achieve covert and overt victory in Afghanistan as well. Yet, Obama said we need to press Pakistan and take care of Osama et. al. by ourselves if necessary. As McCain rightly observed, you don't announce your intentions to your enemies, and doesn't Obama realize we have CIA assets in Pakistan who no doubt at this very moment are operating undercover? You don't unnecessarily put your troops at risk.
And, last but not least, isn't the lack of respect towards McCain revealing? Obama consistently referred to McCain as "John," ironically, even calling him "Tom" at one point, as if they were long-time colleagues from the Senate. They are not. In the Senate, Obama is in the background but McCain is a player who has reached across the aisle and cooperated with Democracts to sponsor major legislation. McCain, on the other hand, conducted himself as a gentleman, and respectfully referred to Obama as "Senator."
In the critical issue of experience versus judgement, McCain's experience trumped Obama's hailing of his sound judgement by calling him to task. Obama can not deliver; he is the Teflon candidate.
To wit, Palin is a political choice for the Republican ticket, if she does not know all the intricacies of foreign policy, she will simply do what all Vice-Presidents do, study for the job and if history calls upon her, God help us if she is not ready.
This is the traditional role of Vice-Presidents anyway. Most just fade away over time. The more interesting aspect of the Republican ticket, it seems to me, is that many people already have poor McCain dead and buried while displaying an unhealthy predilection towards age discrimination.
Many older people can and do have important contributions to make to this country. I would hope that the nay-sayers would lighten up. McCain might not die tomorrow.
Bush has proposed a $700 billion bailout for the troubled U.S. economy.
The proposal was drafted by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.
The troubling aspect of the Obama campaign is that he previously just played politics as usual by lashing out at the Bush administration, McCain, and the handling of the crisis on Wall Street as well as the $700 billion bailout plan by Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson.
The move would be the most sweeping economic intervention by the government since the Great Depression. Maybe we should think about it first: 'ya think?
Colin Powell criticized McCain's toughness on Moscow. He pointed out that the Russian Federation had legitimate interests in the region. Interestingly, Powell has not decided which candidate to back. He stated the election of an African-American president "would be electrifying, but at the same time [I have to] make a judgment here on which would be best for America." Powell is hedging his bets.
Henry Kissinger, who served under Nixon and Ford, said the U.S. needs Russia for help on Iran and we may need Russia if Pakistan evolves in a positive direction.
Madeleine Albright stated that the U.S. did not understand Iranian society. Yes, Madeleine, so what is your point? Does Iran understand us?
Warren Christopher said we should check how authentic the Iranians are while we attempt to negotiate with them. We have to be wary because of their nuclear potential but without substantive dialogue we have few alternatives "because, frankly, the military options here are very, very poor." He is correct on that point.
Pakistan may yet need U.S. intervention. We have eliminated three senior al Qaeda leaders who have been killed in the attacks. Also, the Haqqanis, run by Jalaluddin and Siraj Haqqani, has also been hit heavily. We need to attack these targets because otherwise AQ will have the ability to plan and conduct attacks against the West since we know these are the staging grounds for attacks against us. Pakistan may regret having these cretins in their midst.
Pakistan's leaders seem to think you can placate the insurgents but the suicide attack against the Marriott Hotel should convince them otherwise. The majority of those killed were Pakistanis.
Graphic source: Language and Communication
Poetry recitals by Osama Bin Laden will be published from performances at wedding banquets and feasts from the 1990s. The performance tapes were preserved on recordings recovered from his compound in Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks. Professor Flagg Miller, an Arabist at the University of California, Davis, reports that Bin Laden excells in a standard Arabic poetic form, hamasa--a warlike poetic tradition from Oman--that is enormously popular throughout the Islamic world. Bin Laden was so well known at the time that many people taped him and the recordings were circulated like pop songs.
Some sample lines of one poem states:
“A youth who plunges into the smoke of war smiling stains the blades of lances red. May God not let my eye stray from the most eminent humans, lest they fall.”
The FBI originally suspected that the poems may have coded messages to sleeper cells but it seems more obvious that Bin Laden simply expressed himself in a typical Islamic manner. The search for coded messages, hidden in typical Arabic poetry, is part and parcel of how the U.S. fails to grasp the obvious. Bin Laden explicitly stated his intentions, and then carried out all of his threats, all in plain sight (Cf. Michael Scheuer, Through Our Enemies Eyes). In addition, the FBI has no place, operating as it is as a fish out of water, in the brutal, cut-throat overseas world of jihad.
About 20 tapes feature the “distinctive monotone” of Bin Laden, according to Miller. Excerpts from the tapes will appear in the October issue of the journal Language and Communication, (Cf. The Abstract below).
The tapes often revealed news to family members about the deaths of their sons. According to Miller, Bin Laden's poems were calculating: “He crafts his words to excite the urban dissatisfied youth, offering them escape from their elders and villages. Instead, many just die in terrible ways.”
Miller plans to write a book about Bin Laden’s poetry while the tapes will be preserved at Yale University where they will be available to scholars.
Abstract
This article explores area studies contributions to sociolinguistics by examining Sunni reformers’ use of the Arabic term al-qācida, or a “pragmatic base.” Material is drawn from an audiocassette collection formerly owned by Usāma Bin Lādı¯n. Divergent approaches to the qācida suggest that the term functions a base for many forms of spatial, temporal, social, and ethical orientation. Much of the critical leverage of the concept stems from speakers’ sense of Arabic as a template of ethical attunement that cues language users to founding Muslim lifeways and leaders in and beyond the Arabian Peninsula. A review of Western Arabic sociolinguistics shows how scholars have hampered and also enhanced an understanding of the pragmatic resourcefulness of Arabic. Special attention is given to the ways area studies can help situate Arabic as a signifying practice that accommodates diverse textual, historical, and territorial claims.
This should be a good move since Pakistan has dragged its feet while claiming they are allied with us in the war on terror. With the massive amounts of support and aid the U.S. has squandered on the Pakistanis, they are no closer to shutting down the Taliban and other AQAM than before. The Pakistanis have been adept at manipulating American officials and have been eager to receive weaponry and equipment that look as if best suited to oppose its regional rival India.
Since Pakistan has accused the U.S. of violating Pakistani sovereignty, as if Pakistan had sovereignty throughout its entire nation, which it doesn't; and, I believe Pakistan fails as a supposed ally in the war on terror, the building of a U.S. training facility, on Pakistani soil and with their permission, is a solid move against the Taliban and AQAM. The U.S. can take care of business.
Whoever heard such an outrageous comment from a supposed ally as Pakistani officials issued a warning that they might open fire on Coalition troops crossing into Pakistani territory?
Either Pakistan is with us or they are against us. And, if they do not prosecute the war on terror with zeal, then, we will. We can not afford to have our troops subject to attack while the insurgents simply scurry back across the lawless Pakistani regions (FATA).
Graphic source: Reuters
The youngest Briton, Hammaad Munshi, 18, ever to be convicted of a terrorism offense was jailed for two years for his worldwide plot to target non-Muslims. His co-accused Aabid Hussain Khan recruited Munshi when he was 15 and at just 16 Munshi was arrested in Dewsbury, northern England for his support of AQ. Khan will serve a 12 year term while their cell-mate Sultain Muhammad was sentenced to a 10-year term. Munshi was found guilty of being part of a cell that spread extremist propaganda and provided practical guides on how to make poisons and suicide vests. The Internet was his tool as he circulated material including technical documents on how to make napalm and homemade explosives, and discussed how to smuggle a sword through airport security. He was sentenced to two years in a young offenders' institution. Prosecutors said Munshi was part of a cell that provided information on terrorist techniques, training, weapons and explosives.
Graphic source: CNN
Susan Ali Elbaneh, a U.S. citizen, was killed in the terrorist attack in Yemen, site of the attack on the U.S.S. Cole. She was 19 and had been married for just two months. She died alongside her husband. Ironically, and just a coincidence that she was killed in the attack, Elbaneh is a relative of Yemeni-American Jaber Elbaneh who is on the FBI's most wanted list. Yemen has not cooperated in extraditing Jaber. Elbaneh had accompanied her sister in law who had an appointment with the embassy. During the attack, Ms. Elbaneh's nephew, aged three, may also be among the casualties.
The U.S. had only recently decided to return to the Embassay after having pulling out citing security concerns.
The highly coordinated and complex attack is usually a hallmark of AQ attacks but another group, the Yemeni Islamic Jihad, has claimed responsibility. How the group and AQ are related is unclear. Leading figures include Qasim al Raymi and Nasser al Wahayshi, two of the 23 AQ insurgents who escaped prison in February 2006. Hamza al Quaity, the former leader of Yemeni Islamic Jihad, also escaped during the same prison break and later formed Yemeni Islamic Jihad. All three have strong ties to al Qaeda.
All told, 16 people were killed in the attack, which did not involve U.S. service personnel. In addition, the actions of the Yemeni security forces apparently thwarted the attack and bore the brunt of the casuality toll.
The mustard comes off the hot dog.
There have been at least fifty attacks since January in the Gulf of Aden and Indian Ocean. The International Maritime Bureau, a private non-profit organisation that tracks such data, says seizures of ships and sailors are running at their highest level since 1991, when it first started to collect piracy data.
If the EU does decide to act, their justification is within the framework of United Nations Security Council resolution 1816, which the members unanimously adopted in June. The potential action is also in line with their recent higher-profile role in efforts to promote security in Africa, having deployed a 3,700-strong peacekeeping force in eastern Chad this year.
The next more positive development, although there are no signs of anything of the sort happening now, is that India and possibly China would send additional personnel.
In 2004, a hacker group called TeAmZ USA had knocked out the websites of Abu Musal al-Zarqawi, late head of the Al Qaeda in Iraq, for showing tapes of Westerners being beheaded. The hackers left the image of a gun-toting penguin on the website.
My blog may be hard to take at times, but I assure you, I did not make this story up.
Checkpoint-friendly bags allow laptops to be fully visible to security scanners. This scan was taken by Aerovation, which went to the distributor of the X-ray equipment used by TSA and rented its lab. Graphic source: Aerovation
While traveling this summer I noticed all the difficulties people had with their laptops, especially at one of the most secure airports I traveled through: Phoenix. The issue arises once people are required to remove their laptops from their protective cases. Laptops get dropped, damaged, forgotten and even stolen outright. One study by Dell estimated that about 12,000 laptops are lost in U.S. airports every week. All you need is for yours to be one of the numbers and its costly.
Presently, the TSA has recognized the importance of the laptop issue and on the market now are five criteria: a designated laptop-only section; a laptop-only section that completely unfolds to lay flat on the X-ray conveyor belt; no metal snaps, zippers or buckles inside, underneath or on top of the laptop-only section; no pockets on the inside or outside of the laptop-only section; and, nothing packed in the laptop-only section other than the computer itself.
There are eight full-featured TSA-approved cases, available now or soon, with pockets and compartments that hold everything from your power adapter and accessories to a change of clothes: Aerovation Checkpoint Friendly Laptop Bag, CODi Phantom CT3, Mobile Edge ScanFast Backpack, Pathfinder Wheeled Checkpoint Friendly CompuBrief, Skooba Design Checkthrough, Solo CheckFast Laptop Clamshell, Targus Zip-Thru 15.4" Corporate Traveler Laptop Case, and the Tom Bihn Checkpoint Flyer Briefcase.
The solution seems to be working towards a solution as YouTube revises its community standards, or Terms of Service. The key line is the note about "inciting others to commit violent acts or to violate the terms of use are taken very seriously."
There are countries in which free speech to incite others to violence is not protected speech. In Canada for example, freedom of speech is generally protected under Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Criminal Code of Canada, however, limits these freedoms and provides for several forms of punishable hate speech. The form of punishable hate speech considered to encompass fighting words is identified in Section 319. Free speech has its limitations when it is an incitement to violence against others.
Lieberman's point is along these lines. He stated: "YouTube was being used by Islamist terrorist organizations to recruit and train followers via the Internet and to incite terrorist attacks around the world, including right here in the United States, and Google should be commended for recognizing that." He added: "I expect these stronger community guidelines to decrease the number of videos on YouTube produced by al-Qaeda and affiliated Islamist terrorist organizations."
Pakistan’s newly elected president, Asif Ali Zardari, arrives in Britain today. He will hold talks with Gordon Brown and David Miliband, the foreign secretary. He will appeal to them to exert their influence to halt the unauthorised bombings.
One of the most frustrating things about computing is that the equipment does not work simply. I envision the day when computer use is as simple as a television. You simply plug it in, and it works, although T.V.'s are evolving to be more complicated than that. The point holds for T.V.'s `back in the day.' Along comes a work that I recently reviewed (forthcoming) which outlines current work in computing, Model Checking, that seems to be a useful area of endeavor. Working closely with programmers and computer specialists I never cease to marvel at their technical abilities, though computers themselves still seemed obtuse. However, even for non-specialists, the area of Model Checking is intriguing because computing specialists in this area may be solving some of the most frustrating aspects of computing: waste and delay. I intend to follow some of the current work in the field in the hopes that computing will be more efficient and practical.
Graphic source: The Long War Journal
In what is probably the most fascinating set of documents yet uncovered, a number of AQ letters reveals what has become obvious in the long war community: AQ is fragmenting in Iraq. Ayman al Zawahiri, al Qaeda's second in command, Abu Ayyub al Masri, al Qaeda in Iraq's leader, and Abu Omar al Baghdadi, the leader of al Qaeda's Islamic State of Iraq exchanged letters which were intercepted by Coalition forces. The letters reveal that AQ's senior leadership has lost confidence in AQ's leadership in Iraq. Perhaps even more revealing is a graphic revealing the loss of territory by AQ between 2006 up to the present. A picture is worth a thousand words.
Posts
All Comments
Share |
CIO and Strategy & Business magazines
Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science
SD Times: Software Development News
SC Magazine for Security Professionals
Government Technology: Solutions for State and Local Government in the Information Age
What's Running is a great tool so that you can see what is running on your desktop.
Process Lasso lets you view your processor and its responsiveness.
Online Armor lets you view your firewall status.
Avast is a terrific scrubber of all virus miscreants.
ClamWin is an effective deterrent for the little nasty things that can crop into your machine.
Ad-Aware is a sound anti-virus tool.
For all your electronic appliance needs research products on this terrific site.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Posts
All Comments
