The second debate will go to Obama since he is exercising the better strategy. He is running against Bush c. 2003 and he has effectively painted McCain as third term Bush. It matters little what he actually says, since he says very little, and McCain needed a slam dunk to catch up in the polls which will not happen after this last performance.
Obama says that Iraq is wrong-headed and expensive but we were wrong to go there; yet, we should insert ourselves in Africa as a humanitarian gesture to stop human suffering. Moreover, we should enforce a no-fly zone as well. Uhh, Senator, this was the original policy in Iraq. Where have you been?
And, while on the topic of fixing other country's problems, aren't we broke as a nation? Didn't we just bail out Wall Street to the tune of $700 Billion? So, we should not support Iraq, in fact, we should set a timetable and get out because that is what Bush wanted. Yet, we should get out and go elsewhere? We should now go to Africa and extend ourselves there? Uhh, Senator, where have you been? We did this in Somalia, as a humanitarian gesture, and our troops were attacked. We left.
I know the words sound good but a greater grasp of the actual conditions and a review of what the U.S. has already tried would be instructive.