Do you like him any better now?
No?
Then you're not a racist.
A Republican senator from Louisiana, David Vitter, is suggesting the dispute over Obama's eligibility to be president be resolved in court.
"I support conservative legal organizations and others who would bring that to court," the Associated Press reported a video of the event revealed him saying.
Vitter becomes just the latest high-profile leader, and the first U.S. senator, to take such a strong stand on the issue.
Vitter was responding to a constituent who on Sunday at a town hall meeting in Metairie, La., asked about Obama's "refusal to produce" a "birth certificate."
The AP reported the crowd applauded the question, and Vitter said he doesn't have personal "standing" for litigation.
But he said he supports those groups that are bringing the question to court.
"I think that is the valid and most possibly effective grounds to do it," he said.
He said "first and foremost" Americans need to "fight the Obama agenda at the ballot box starting this fall."
Vitter said, according to the AP report, that the matters of the nation are too important to be diverted by distractions.
“Well I voted for Obama, I helped write one of his speeches,” Zuckerman told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto.
Asked which speech he helped write, Zuckerman responded, “I’d rather not go into that.”
Zuckerman was identified by John Mearsheimer, political science professor at the University of Chicago, and Stephen Walt, academic dean of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, as a a member of the media wing of the “Israeli lobby” in the United States. Zuckerman responded to the charge by stating he was “proud” to be part of the Israeli lobby.
Islamist terror groups like Hamas’ Izzidin al-Qassam, whose logo features a Koran and other Islamic imagery, describe their missions in religious terms. Experts say the Obama regime’s counter-terror effort cannot ignore the religious motivation driving extremists. (Image: Izzidin al-Qassam Web site)
Obama is at odds with the Petraeus doctrine on Islam. Petraeus clearly defined the enemy in his 2006 Counter-insurgency manual. The Petraeus doctrine refers to "Islamic insurgents," "Islamic extremists" and "Islamic subversives." It details ties between Muslim support groups and terrorists. From the beginning of the text, I-22ff, Petraeus rightfully describes the enemy and has successfully combated Islamism to protect American soldiers. It is not for Petraeus to be an apologist nor unduly politically correct when defining the Islam he battles. Obama is violating the wall of separation between religion and state (although he has little compunction against minimizing Christianity and separating it from the U.S. government) by advocating Islamic interests from the White House. With the recent resignation of McChrystal I wonder if this disconnect between Obama's advocacy of Islam and the enemy Americans fight overseas played a role.
John O. Brennan, Obama's chief national security adviser for counter-terrorism, delivered a major policy address on defining the enemy. He laid out the White House policy of detaching any reference to Islam. Moreover, Brennan has largely functioned as running interference for Islam since being appointed.
Obama advisor John Brennan speaks about the beauty of Islam.
Cf. White House's Brennan linked to flotilla organizers.
Share |
CIO and Strategy & Business magazines
Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science
SD Times: Software Development News
SC Magazine for Security Professionals
Government Technology: Solutions for State and Local Government in the Information Age
What's Running is a great tool so that you can see what is running on your desktop.
Process Lasso lets you view your processor and its responsiveness.
Online Armor lets you view your firewall status.
Avast is a terrific scrubber of all virus miscreants.
ClamWin is an effective deterrent for the little nasty things that can crop into your machine.
Ad-Aware is a sound anti-virus tool.
For all your electronic appliance needs research products on this terrific site.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
A tax on toilet paper; I kid you not. According to the sponsor, "the Water Protection and Reinvestment Act will be financed broadly by small fees on such things as . . . products disposed of in waste water." Congress wants to tax what you do in the privacy of your bathroom.