LinkedIn Optimization

/linkedin-search-engine-optimization

REL 212 Zoroastrian Cosmology

/culturalinstitute/beta/exhibit

Militia Defense

well-regulated-inside-indiana-militia

REL 212 U.S. Female Genital Mutilation

thousand-u-s-risk-female-genital-mutilation-feds-say

Free or Cheaper Tools

almost-350-free-or-cheaper-tools

Obama More Corrupt Than Watergate: FBI Lovers, Clinton Email Scandal

FBI-lovers-texts-Obama-wanted-info-Clinton-email-probe

Obama Lies and Violates the Constitution

Audio Software Tool

audio-recording-software

Gamification Engagement

does-gamification-improve-engagement

Lord of the Flies, 1963

Subtitled

Hate Trump, Oops, Obama

Speech

REL 212 Iran Anti-Hijab Protests

Iran-anti-hijab-protests-continue-despite-earlier-arrests

FISA Memo

	GMick , The memo's been released...  ...and the shocking information we've learned in the past 24 hours shows the worst treason in living memory – perhaps ever – in the history of our Republic.  We now know with certainty that there's a "state within a state" functioning inside our government with one destructive goal:  to take down the Trump administration.  Disturbing doesn't begin to cover it.  So I hope you'll scroll down to read Daniel Greenfield's FrontPage Magazine article explaining the impact of the Left's efforts to destroy the Trump presidency.  Sincerely,   David Horowitz THE MEMO REVEALS THE COUP AGAINST AMERICA The memo has been released, now it's time to release everything. February 2, 2018 Daniel Greenfield The Democrats and the media spent a week lying to the American people about the "memo."  The memo was full of "classified information" and releasing" it would expose "our spying methods." By "our," they didn't mean American spying methods. They meant Obama's spying methods. A former White House Ethics Lawyer claimed that the Nunes memo would undermine "national security." On MSNBC, Senator Chris Van Hollen threatened that if the memo is released, the FBI and DOJ "will refuse to share information with the House and Senate Intelligence Committees." Senator Cory Booker howled that releasing the memo was "treasonous" and might be "revealing sources and methods" and even "endangering fellow Americans in the intelligence community." The memo isn't treasonous. It reveals a treasonous effort by the Democrats to use our intelligence agencies to rig an election and overturn the will of the voters. The only two "sources" 18 are Christopher Steele, who was funded by the Clinton campaign, and a Yahoo News article, that were used to obtain a FISA warrant against a Trump associate. That Yahoo story came from Michael Isikoff, the reporter who knew about Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky but suppressed it. It was based on more leaks from Steele which the FBI and DOJ chose to ignore. Steele's identity was already well known. The only new source revealed is Yahoo News. No vital intelligence sources were compromised at Yahoo News. And no Yahoo News agents were killed. The media spent a week lying to Americans about the dangers of the memo because it didn't want them to find out what was inside. Today, the media and Dems switched from claiming that the memo was full of "classified information" that might get CIA agents killed to insisting that it was a dud and didn't matter. Oh what tangled webs we weave when first we practice to deceive. On Thursday, the narrative was that the memo would devastate our national security and no one should ever be allowed to read it. By Friday, the new narrative was that the memo tells us nothing important and we shouldn't even bother reading it. The lies change, but suppressing the memo remains the goal. Rep. Nadler, infamous for securing pardons for Weather Underground bombers, got caught between narratives when he insisted that the memo was "overhyped," but suggested that it "endangers national security." "I don't think anybody will be terribly shocked by what's in the memo," he told CNN.  And requested an emergency meeting of the House Judiciary Committee – a body he will head if Democrats win the mid-term elections.  Calling emergency meetings is not the response to an "overhyped" and non-shocking memo. There is no legitimately classified information in the Nunes memo. But it does endanger a number of "Americans" in the "intelligence community" who colluded with the Clinton campaign against America.  It endangers former FBI Director Comey, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and the current FBI General Counsel Dana Boente who had previously served as the Acting Attorney General. These men and women had allegedly signed FISA applications that were at best misleading and at worst badly tainted. The Clinton campaign had enlisted figures in the FBI and the DOJ to manipulate an election. The coup against America operated as a "state within a state" inside the United States government.  "The political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials," the memo informs us. But they did not reveal on the FISA application that their core evidence came from the Clinton campaign. Sources were certainly being protected. But they were Clinton sources. The memo reveals that without the Steele dossier there would have been no eavesdropping on Carter Page, the Trump associate targeted in this particular case. "Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information." But the FISA application neglected to mention that its primary source had been paid by the Clinton campaign, was unverified and would continue to be unverified. FBI Director Comey testified that he had told President Trump that the dossier was "unverified." Yet the "unverified" piece of opposition research was used as the basis for a FISA application. As Rep. Jim Jordan noted, "FBI takes 'salacious and unverified' dossier to secret court to get secret warrant to spy on a fellow American, and FBI doesn't tell the court that the DNC/Clinton campaign paid for that dossier. And they did that FOUR times." "There's been no evidence of a corrupt evidence to obtain warrants against people in the Trump campaign," Rep. Adam Schiff insisted. That's why he tried to block the release of the evidence. The evidence was unverified opposition research. Its source had been paid by the Clinton campaign. Not only had Steele been indirectly working for the Clinton campaign (when he wasn't being paid by the FBI), but he made no secret of his own political agenda to stop Trump. "In September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he "was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president," the memo informs us. That's former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr whose wife was being paid by an organization hired by the Clinton campaign to investigate Trump. Ohr then passed along his wife's opposition research to the FBI. The evidence couldn't be any more corrupt than that. Steele was passionate about Trump "not being president." So were his handlers who ignored his leaks to the media until he "was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations-an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI." His previous meetings, including the one that allegedly generated the Yahoo News article, were ignored. Tainted investigations are nothing new. Law enforcement is as fallible as any other profession. But the memo reveals a snapshot of just how many top figures colluded in this corrupted and tainted effort. What drove them to violate professional ethical norms and legal requirements in the FISA applications? Top DOJ and FBI officials shared Steele's "passion," and that of his ultimate employer, Hillary Clinton, to stop Donald Trump at all costs. And they're still trying to use the Mueller investigation to overturn the election results in a government coup that makes Watergate look like a children's tea party, Former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe is already under investigation. He's suspected of trying to sit on the Wiener emails until the election was over. This alleged failed cover-up triggered the Comey letter which hurt Hillary worse than a timely revelation would have. McCabe's wife had financial links to the Clintons.  Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates was an Obama holdover who had foolishly tried to use the DOJ to go to war with President Trump. Both Yates and Dana Boente were Obama and Holder choices. During the groundless prosecution of the former Republican governor of Virginia, Boente had declared, "No one is above the law." We'll see if that's true with everyone who signed the FISA applications. If Boente signed false or misleading FISA applications, he should be removed as FBI General Counsel. The memo is only the first crack in the wall. But it's grounds for an investigation that will expose the abuses that led to eavesdropping on Trump officials. And the motives of those who perpetuated them.  A Washington Post piece suggested that just releasing the memo alone would allow Mueller to charge President Trump with "obstruction of justice." That's how badly they want to get Trump. A clear and simple fact emerges from the memo. Top figures in the DOJ and the FBI, some loyal to Obama and Hillary, abused the FISA process in the hopes of influencing or reversing the results of an election by targeting their political opponents. The tool that they used for the job came from the Clinton campaign. Using America's intelligence services to destroy and defeat a political opponent running for president is the worst possible abuse of power and an unprecedented threat to a democratic system of free open elections.  We have been treated to frequent lectures about the independence of the DOJ and the FBI. But our country isn't based around government institutions that are independent of oversight by elected officials. When unelected officials have more power than elected officials, that's tyranny.  A Justice Department that acts as the Praetorian Guard for a political campaign is committing a coup and engaging in treason. The complex ways that the Steele dossier was laundered from the Clinton campaign to a FISA application is evidence of a conspiracy by both the DOJ and the Clinton campaign.  It's time for us to learn about all the FISA abuses, the list of NSA unmasking requests of Trump officials by Obama officials and the eavesdropping on members of Congress. We deserve to know the truth. The memo has been released. Now it's time to release everything.  DONATE SHARE ABOUT DANIEL GREENFIELD Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.  READ MORE
The David Horowitz Freedom Center is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. All donations are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 55089 Sherman Oaks, CA 91499 © Copyright 2018, HorowitzFreedomCenter.org

This message was intended for: gmicksmith@gmail.com
You were added to the system March 27, 2014.
For more information click here. Update your preferences
Unsubscribe | Unsubscribe via email

Phone Interviews

1. "Can you tell me exactly what I would be expected to do if I were hired for this position? "

This question helps to make sure you know exactly what you’re going to be doing and what is expected of you.  This is a great way to make sure there are no nasty surprises waiting for you when you start.  Having your job explicitly laid out for you not only allows you to know what you’re signing up to do, but can also help you decide if you are not only willing to do the work…but also able!

2. "Can you walk me through a typical day here at Company X?"

Having the day laid out for you from beginning to end is a smart way to get a quick overview of what is expected of you outside the job description.  I was hired for a job once where all the employees were expected to participate in a group physical activity before starting our day. 

Had I not asked about a typical day I would have been completely unprepared for my first day and unable to participate.  Not a great way to start out a new job!    

— THE REQUIREMENTS —

3. "If I were hired for this position, would I be going through any training prior to actually starting the work?"

This is a great question to ask…especially if you are concerned about your ability to do the job.  With the right training, an employee can quickly be brought up to company speed.  If no training is offered and you’re not sure you know enough to do the job…this would also be a great time to get clarification on that.

4. "How will I be trained?"

Again, you want to make sure you’re going into the job with your eyes wide open.  Training could be as simple as watching a video or reading a brochure or it could be a much more thorough and in-depth process.  The point is, you want to know before you go.

— THE EXPECTATIONS —

5. "What are the performance expectations for this position?  Will that expectation change the longer I am doing the job?"

This is a two part question…but knowledge is power and the more you have, the better off you are!  You want to make sure you and your employer establish early on what they expect from you performance wise and not just for the immediate future.  If this is a job you plan on sticking with for a period of time, make sure early on that you know what they want  you to do and if that will change over time.

6. "Is there an employee performance review process?  How often does that occur and can you walk me through a typical one?"

Again, a two part question but this information is absolutely critical…especially if the results of those reviews impacts your ability to advance either your career or your position within the company.

— THE COMPANY —

7. "Where do you see the company in five years?  10?"

This question is important because not only will it give you a sense of how stable your job might be, but the job you take today should always be in line with your long term career goals.  The last thing you want to do is take a job that won’t benefit you in the long run or help advance you towards the next step on your career path.  Finding out early on where the company is headed in the long term can help you plan your own trajectory.

8. "Can you tell me what the career paths are for this department and what sort of advancements I could work towards?"

This question can give you a solid idea of the mobility within the company.  Again, as we’ve said over and over again, the ultimate goal of any job you take is to help advance you on your career path and the last thing you want to do is take a dead end job with no hope of ever moving forward or growing.

— THE PEOPLE —

9. "Will I be working with a team and if I am, can you tell me a little about each of them?"

This question is a MUST!  The last thing you want to do is get stuck with a bunch of people you can’t stand.  Finding out early on if you’re going to be working with a good team or a horrible team can make your decision process an easy one.

10. "Can you tell me about my direct supervisor?  Is there anything I should know about working with them that will make my integration a smooth process?"

Another two-parter, but again, you’re showing that you’re serious about doing what it takes to not only get the job, but do the job right.  It’s also a great way to get a bit of information about your supervisor.  Like the rest of the people you’re going to work with…if it’s not a good match, then it might not be the job you want to take.

— THE ATMOSPHERE —

11. "Can you tell me what you love the most about working here?"

This is information you need to know!  The last thing you want to do is to work somewhere where you’re miserable and a good way to get a feel for that is to ask the hiring manager what it is that keeps them coming in day after day.

12. "How would you describe the working environment here?  Is work done in a collaborative style or are employees more independent?"

This is a question that is going to not only give you a good heads up on what you are potentially walking into as far as atmosphere goes, but also lets you know what the expectations are for your own performance.  Again, two-parter, but the information you’re going to get in return is pure gold.

— THE WAITING GAME —

13. "What are the next steps in the interview process?"

This is not only a question you can ask to show you’re interested in where the hiring process is going to go next, it’s also a great way for you to get some reassurance.  Nobody likes waiting to hear back from a company and getting nothing…at least this way you’re prepped for how the process will continue and what to expect…and when.

14. "Is there anything else I can provide you with that would be helpful or questions I can answer?"

This isn’t so much a fact finding question as it is one last opportunity to let the interviewer make sure they’ve covered all their bases.  Brownie points!

Putting It All Together

So there you have it…not only do you now know why you should have good questions to ask during an interview, you also know how to ask them and what to ask them. 

Make sure you take the same amount of time to prep these as you spend on the rest of your interview prep and above all, be yourself, be genuine, be the PERFECT CANDIDATE…

Good luck!

Nail Job Interview Over Phone
Keys
Ace
Tips
Tips to Ace
Mastering
Mistake
Advice
Toughest

Trump Promotes Islam

Trump EEOC Gets Settlement for Muslim Security Guard Discriminated by Co.’s Grooming Policy

JANUARY 31, 2018

Keeping with an Obama practice of pursuing American businesses that won’t accommodate Muslims, the Trump administration sued a security company for refusing to modify its grooming standards. This constituted religious discrimination, according to the government, because the Muslim employee requested the grooming exemption in accordance with his “sincerely held religious beliefs.” In a settlement reached this month between the company and the government, the security guard gets $90,000 in damages and the firm must hire an equal employment monitor and revise its religious accommodation policies.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the bloated federal agency that enforces the nation’s workplace discrimination laws, filed the lawsuit in December against Allied Universal in United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Allied is a national company with more than 150,000 employees that protect tens of thousands of clients across the country. The plaintiff, William Webb, was hired as a security guard to work in the San Diego area. After getting hired, he asked for the grooming exemption and the company refused. The EEOC, which filed dozens of similar lawsuits during the Obama administration, alleges in its complaint that Allied’s conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits religious discrimination and requires employers to make reasonable accommodations to employees’ sincerely held religious beliefs.

“The EEOC's Complaint alleges that Defendant unlawfully discriminated against Charging Party William Webb ("Webb") based on religion (Islam) in violation of Sections 701 G) and 703(a) Title VII,” according to the lawsuit. “More specifically, the Complaint alleges that Defendant failed to provide Webb a religious accommodation and discharged him based on his religion, Islam. The commission also alleges that Defendant discharged Webb in retaliation for having engaged in protected activity in violation of Section 704(a) of Title VII.” Besides doling out cash for upholding its longtime grooming policy, Allied must pay for an equal employment monitor—that must be approved by the EEOC—and provide training for all employees, supervisors and managers involved in the religious accommodation process. Among the monitor’s responsibilities is ensuring that the company “maintains and implements nation-wide an anti-discrimination, religious accommodation, and anti-retaliation policy and reporting procedure,” according to the settlement.

In a statement celebrating the victory, an EEOC attorney commends Allied for taking remedies to ensure future religious discrimination will not occur. The agency lawyer also gives notice to other companies that the EEOC will go after them if they don’t follow Allied’s lead in addressing religious accommodation issues. The press release also reminds that “eliminating discriminatory policies affecting vulnerable workers who may be unaware of their rights” is a priority of a national Strategic Enforcement Plan (SEP) launched in 2012 under the Obama administration. Another SEP focus is to help “immigrant, migrant and other vulnerable workers” and crack down on pay disparities that persist based on race and ethnicity. SEP was recently renewed by the Trump EEOC until 2021.

Under Obama the agency took a special interest in protecting followers of Islam by going after American businesses that refused to change longtime policies for Muslim workers. The EEOC sued a clothing retailer with a policy against head covers of any kind for religious discrimination because it would not allow a female employee at one of its stores to wear a head scarf as required by her religion. An Obama-appointed federal judge in northern California handed the administration a victory, ruling that the Muslim woman’s civil rights were violated. The EEOC also helped two Muslim truck drivers get a hefty cash settlement after being fired for refusing to transport alcohol because it violated their religious beliefs. The judge in that case, an Obama appointee in Illinois, ruled in favor of the Muslims and the Peoria-based trucking company had to pay $240,000 in punitive damages. This month’s settlement in the lawsuit against the security company indicates the Trump administration will not put an end to the deranged Obama policies.

Tariq Ramadan Rape

Rape

Free Market Capitalism and Economic Growth

Larry P. Arnn joins Hugh Hewitt to talk about President Trump’s recent speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. They discuss the success of free-market capitalism and the burden of bureaucratic regulation.

European Women Fight Back Against Islamists

Obama's FBI Spied on Opposing Party's Candidate

Corrupt Obama

Intelligence Exercise

Intelligence

Christians Persecuted for Their Faith

Persecution