Ayers Bombing Victim in Public Email

John Murtagh, who said his home was firebombed by the Weather Underground in 1971, has gone public in an email. Murtagh's father was a New York State Supreme Court justice presiding over the trial of members of the Black Panther Party charged in a plot to bomb New York landmarks and department stores. Murtagh stated: "Barack Obama may have been a child when William Ayers was plotting attacks against U.S. targets -- but I was one of those targets. Barack Obama's friend tried to kill my family."

Africom Foreign Policy Blunder: Another Rummy Move

Another foreign policy blunder, the new United States Africa Command (Africom) became fully operational. This is the last major action proposed by former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld intended to support U.S. military and diplomatic initiatives across a huge continent and among an unbelievably complex population. Although there is little in the area that is critical to the security needs of the U.S., not to mention financial difficulties at home, is seems to be the height of folly to overextend our military resources to a new and largely hostile area. I believe that it is only a matter of time before the U.S. gets bogged down again in a Somalia like situation.

Emergency Filing Blocks Release of Terrorist Trainees

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals granted the Bush administration's motion for an emergency stay to prevent the release of seventeen Chinese Uighers found in terrorist camps after 9/11. In an emergency motion filed overnight, Justice Department attorneys said only the executive branch--not the courts--may decide whether to admit an alien into the United States. The government stated the decision to free the detainees "threatens serious harm to the interests of the United States and its citizens by mandating that the government release in the nation's capital 17 individuals who engaged in weapons training at a military training camp."

Chinese Plead for Release from Taliban

Graphic source: Afpax Insider

Two Chinese engineers kidnapped 29 August appeared on a video released by the Taliban. They pleaded for their release.

Call Those Two Running for President

Someone should be informing those guys who are running for President. Interior ministry spokesman Major General Abdel Karim Khalaf said today Iraq was ready to take over security responsibilities from U.S. security forces in Baghdad. Baghdad is now averaging four attacks a day, which according to US statistics was 89 percent less than in 2006, and 83 percent lower than in 2007. A majority of the benchmarks established by Iraq have been met already. It seems fair to state that the picture in Iraq is that any security is tenuous but characterized by clear rubrics.

The candidates are spending quite a bit of time, if they talk about the situation at all, discussing Iraq as if it were 2003. A heads-up Senators, it is 2008.

A Second Attempt at Analyzing the 2nd Debate

The second debate will go to Obama since he is exercising the better strategy. He is running against Bush c. 2003 and he has effectively painted McCain as third term Bush. It matters little what he actually says, since he says very little, and McCain needed a slam dunk to catch up in the polls which will not happen after this last performance.

Obama says that Iraq is wrong-headed and expensive but we were wrong to go there; yet, we should insert ourselves in Africa as a humanitarian gesture to stop human suffering. Moreover, we should enforce a no-fly zone as well. Uhh, Senator, this was the original policy in Iraq. Where have you been?

And, while on the topic of fixing other country's problems, aren't we broke as a nation? Didn't we just bail out Wall Street to the tune of $700 Billion? So, we should not support Iraq, in fact, we should set a timetable and get out because that is what Bush wanted. Yet, we should get out and go elsewhere? We should now go to Africa and extend ourselves there? Uhh, Senator, where have you been? We did this in Somalia, as a humanitarian gesture, and our troops were attacked. We left.

I know the words sound good but a greater grasp of the actual conditions and a review of what the U.S. has already tried would be instructive.

Who Is Qualified?

As an analysis piece of the second Presidential debate, a town hall setting, I would like to explore the question: who is qualified?

1) Break the rules and don't follow the time limits of what you agreed to while the American people are desperately seeking answers to the questions that concern them most;

2) Don't directly answer the questions of those Americans asking the questions.

If you follow number one and two listed above you are not qualified to be the next President. This is my disappointment with the second debate in the town hall round.

Unfortunately, these are the only two viable candidates available but neither McCain nor Obama followed the time rules that their campaigns agreed to nor did either candidate answer the questions they were asked. We know what we are in for: people who break the rules as they see fit and don't have answers to our questions.

At the same time, did you notice the voters? If there ever was a more subdued, concerned, and somber audience at a political event I have not seen it. The body language of the audience members transcended the cold screen of television. And, their revulsion reflects the general mood of Americans. These are dark days for the Republic.

Muslim Chinese Uighurs Terrorists Released in U.S.

U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina today ordered that seventeen Chinese Uighur Muslims held at the Guantanamo Bay military prison be released into the United States by Friday. It was the first time that a U.S. court has ordered the release of a Guantanamo detainee, and the first time that a foreign national held there has been ordered brought to the United States. This is a landmark ruling paving the way for former enemy combatants to be released into the U.S. Urbina said that "the Constitution prohibits indefinite detention without cause." The group has been released into the custody of Uighur families in Washington.

Churchill Quote

Graphic source: Cotswolds.info.com

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."

Sir Winston Churchill

Koranic Training Children: To Die For

Graphic source: AfPax Insider

The Taliban are back at it again and they have reconstituted a Spinkai Ragzai, South Waziristan camp that trains boys seven to fourteen years old to be suicide bombers. A video obtained AfPax Insider shows a camp maintained by Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud. The illustrations show the boys reading from the Quran with an adult Taliban training them. One slide shows a poster board with the words “Killing a Spy” written in English. The Pakistani army destroyed the camp previously and the computers, equipment, and training literature showed graphic details of the training ‘nursery.’ Young boys are seen carrying out executions, a classroom where 10- to 12-year olds are sitting in formations, with a white band of Quranic verses wrapped around their forehead, and there are training videos to show how improvised explosive devices are made and detonated.

The Spinkai camp is one of 157 training camps and more than 400 support locations in the Taliban-controlled tribal areas and in the Northwest Frontier Province.

John Palfrey, a professor at Harvard Law School and co-director of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society, has co-written two books examining online issues -- Access Denied, which examines global Internet censorship and filtering, and Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. The latter book, published last month, set out to provide "digital immigrants" -- older generations of parents, teachers and others -- with a portrait of "digital natives," who were born after 1980.

Palfrey was asked questions and I posted his answer below:

Which findings in the book were most surprising to you? I didn't find as many young people taking advantage of doing everything they could do with technology. I didn't see the outpouring of creativity I was hoping to see.

I wanted to see that the technology was a gateway to get more young people involved in civic life. I didn't find a huge rush to use these technologies to improve the world. There are examples of incredible social entrepreneurs … but there is not a large-scale rush, which I was hoping to see.

Note on Norman Podhoretz, World War IV

This is a quick and easy read but one to stir up controversy if you follow his argument. There are not many people willing to take a positive view of the neocons, since currently they are regularly lampooned publicly, nor many who would dare say that Bush is right on foreign policy but Podhoretz is one such person who will. The closest analogy to Bush he argues is Truman in 1947 who unpopularly enunciated his Doctrine of containment against the Soviets. Eisenhower although differing in many ways did not alter the Truman Doctrine. Podhoretz argues that the Bush Doctrine of preemptive action against our enemies is correct and will be proven true historically.

U.S. Asks Allies/Euros to Pay for Their Defense

In a move that I've long advocated here the U.S. is asking allies such as Japan and NATO allies who have not sent troops to Afghanistan to pony up with the estimated $17 billion needed to build up the Afghan army.

This request may be a two-tiered NATO alliance that U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned against early this year but there is no alternative. The Europeans are going to be hit harder, and most likely before the U.S. next gets attacked by terrorists trained in Afpak camps so they should be willing to pay for their own defense. Gates has been on the frontlines asking U.S. allies to pay for their defense, especially if they are not willing to send troops.

The U.S. has 33,000 troops in Afghanistan. About 22,000 are part of NATO's force of nearly 48,000 troops. The United States contributes the most troops by far among allies, followed by Britain with about 8,000.

The Afghan army plans to double in size to 134,000 soldiers over five years at a cost of $17 billion to $20 billion, according to estimates.

Presidential Candidates At the Bailout Trough

The bloated rhetoric of the two presidential candidates is only exceeded by the nonsense they have both expressed about the financial crisis. Thanks to research by the Center for Responsive Politics the figures they collected speak volumes about how likely the bailout will work. We should know who funds their campaigns. The financial services industries have funded both candidates.

Here is the tally at the trough:

McCain received $19.6 million and Obama garnished $22.5 million.

Two of the biggest financial groups in Washington, the Financial Services Roundtable and the Mortgage Bankers Association, have been holding meetings with McCain and Obama’s economic advisers. They are working to shift their bad debt to taxpayers. The Roundtable has met in private, closed-door sessions with Obama economic advisers Ian Soloman and McCain adviser Ike Brannon. Those lurking around Obama—-economists such as Paul Volcker, Robert Rubin, Lawrence Summers, and Laura Tyson-—are as guilty of dismantling of government regulation as those advising McCain.

I say a pox on both their houses.

Bailouts Work, Sorta'

An important question to ask during these days of bailouts is to ask how things have worked out in the past. The U.S. bailout took place in 1792. William Duer tried to monopolize the market in government bonds and depress the share price of the Bank of New York. His plan went astray which caused market panic. The first Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton authorized banks to accept bonds as collateral for loans, which were then underwritten by the government. He also borrowed money from banks and used it to buy government bonds. The U.S. did well enough then as prices recovered and all the banks involved survived.

On the other hand, Andrew Jackson nearly brought about the collapse of the Second Bank of the United States when he refused to deposit tax revenues in it. The collapse of the bank was an important cause of the Panic of 1837 in which the next president, Martin van Buren, refused to involve the government. This event was a harbringer of the Great Depression.

Thus far, the score is 1-1.

The next disaster was in savings and loans during the 1980s and 1990s. The crisis was caused by institutions lending good money after bad, then getting slammed by rising interest rates. Fraud was also a big factor. The government set up the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) to regulate hundreds of failed S&Ls and try to sell their assets. The taxpayers received back about 80% on the dollar. This one was largely a success.

Then there was the issue in 2001 when the airline industry faced collapse after 9/11. Carriers faced a money crunch when a flying ban was imposed and people were afraid to fly. The government provided compensation. But once flights resumed, the airlines could not get credit. The government set up the Air Transport Stabilization Board to provide up to $10bn in loan guarantees. The government received shares in the airlines in return for guaranteeing loans to them and also charged fees for participating in the scheme. Taxpayers eventually made a profit of $300m. The weaker carriers lost out, such as United Airlines, which was forced into bankruptcy, but most of them survived. Thus, the carrier bail-out largely succeeded.

Most of the bailouts seem to work, basically 3-1 as in this scenario, but what concerns me is the frequency. If the government has to bailout companies, half of the bailouts occurring since the '80s, how vibrant can that economy be?

Judge Considers Release of International Terrorists

The Uighur (pronounced "WEE-gurz") people are Muslims inhabiting the Western region of China. Five of the Uighurs, and twelve more have been mentioned, in filing court papers asking for release. The detainees held at Guantanamo Bay may now be released into the U.S. homeland since these Chinese Muslims are no longer considered enemy combatants. U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina is considering a release. If released, it would become a landmark legal decision in the years-long battle over the rights of terrorism suspects. The men have been held for nearly seven years but they are in a bind. They can not be sent home country because Beijing considers them terrorists and they might be tortured. Previously, the government released five Uighur detainees to Albania in 2006, but no other country wants to risk offending China by accepting the others.

I have two questions: why should the problems of former enemy combatants concern me? And, how did they become former combatants in the first place?

The answer to the latter question is time. Their attorneys argue that the men have been confined for too long. The attornies say authorities could supervise them much as they monitor criminal defendants released pending trial. Yes, I suppose it is a reasonable argument that Washington D.C. is a particularly crimeless area. I wonder if the Judge might like to have the former enemy combatants next door since he was intrigued by the question of release.

How these individuals become enemy combatants is clearer. In 2001, most of the Uighurs now in Guantanamo Bay were living in camps in Afghanistan until U.S. airstrikes drove them into neighboring Pakistan. They were captured there and turned over to U.S. authorities. It is likely then that most of these people were receiving terrorist training and have been biding their time in prison in preparation. Prisons in Britain and Iraq are leading places of terrorist training and development.

The two options that are presented, release into the Homeland, or continued incarceration are the only two choices offered by attorney's on behalf of the Uighurs.

However, I see no reason why Americans should be welcoming individuals who were found in Afghani camps in 2001. Yet, a Supreme Court ruling in June gave camp dwellers the right to have their cases reviewed by federal judges under the legal doctrine of habeas corpus. U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon has been conducting closed-door hearings. There are six Algerians who were picked up in Bosnia in late 2001. The only way to block the continued incarceration or release is evidence that the incarcerated received terrorist training. The Justice Department is expected to make the same argument for the other detainees. The government has asserted that the Uighurs were members of the East Turkistan Islamic Movement and trained at camps affiliated with the Taliban or al-Qaeda. The Bush administration designated ETIM a terrorist organization in August 2002, after the Uighurs were taken into custody.

One academic sees no other alternative than the two options proposed: "It boils down to: either you keep these people in prison at Guantanamo Bay for the rest of their lives or you release them into the United States," said Donald E. Wilkes Jr., a professor at the University of Georgia Law School and an authority on habeas corpus rights.

I see no reason why the U.S. should harbor not only the poor and the tired yearning to be free but those training at terrorist camps while providing rights of habeus corpus to them as well. If there is no reason to hold them, then release them back to China or anywhere so it is not a problem for people in the United States. They voluntarily left their own country for Afghanistan so another move, elsewhere, should not bother them now.

Sharia-Compliant Citi Seeks Taxpayer's Money

Obamics and Sharia compliant, the code of law based on the Koran, Citigroup was blocked by a Judge in the Wachovia-Wells deal. However, New York State Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramoscourt will hold a hearing to allow Citi to press for its previous agreement to buy Wachovia.

In a deal struck last Monday with the assistance of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Citigroup had offered to take over Wachovia's banking operations for $2.2 billion.

The battle also has implications for taxpayers.

If Citigroup is successful in its takeover, taxpayers will pay more because of a FDIC offer. Citigroup has the support of industry regulators, and the FDIC stands behind its previously announced agreement with Citigroup, according to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman Sheila Bairwhich who promised to cover any losses on Wachovia's $300 billion loan portfolio beyond the first $42 billion. The Wells offer does not ask for FDIC assistance.

Wachovia spokeswoman Christy Phillips-Brown stated the company believes its agreement with Wells Fargo is "proper, valid and ... in the best interest of shareholders, employees, and the American taxpayers," the Associated Press reported.

Seems so to me too; I'm a taxpayer.

Obama's Favorite Domestic Terrorist

The wonder of the William Ayers terrorist connection to Obama is not that Palin finally unleashed it, it lies in the fact that the mainstream media was so reluctant to report it when the data become widely available in the spring. I suppose it means less to younger people but if one was alive during those heady days of domestic terrorism the charge sticks like mud. The fact that Ayers is now a professor hardly makes his earlier activities any more respectable. There are probably more anti-American sentiments being expressed in American universities than anywhere else anyway. Both Ayers and his wife are currently college professors.

The Obama camp has tried to downplay the relationship between the terrorists and Obama but that story is sketchy. The University of Illinois at Chicago has released hundreds of documents that solidify the relationship between the two. There are more than 50,000 documents, 128 boxes, and 946 files. The University archives on the pair comes out to 70 linear feet. This is no casual connection.

Ayers was a member of the Weather Underground, a radical group that claimed responsibility for a series of bombings, including nonfatal explosions at the Pentagon and U.S. Capitol, preceding the foreign terrorism problem by many years.

Ayers was a fugitive for years with his wife, fellow radical Bernadine Dohrn, Dohrn is now a professor at Northwestern University Law School. But after surrendering in 1980, the charges against Ayers were dropped because of prosecutorial misconduct. He got off on a technicality we might say.

Moreover, Obama and Ayers both live in the same Hyde Park neighborhood. They served together on the board of a Chicago charity, and in the mid-1990s when Obama first ran for office, Ayers hosted a meet-the-candidate session for Obama at his home. They are more than casual acquaintances, Obama and Ayers share a political ideology.

For a candidate who champions his better judgement over his opponent, Ayers is a curious political supporter to have. Ayers has not denied that he set off bombs and he is on the record that U.S. Marines are terrorists. All John Kerry did was toss a few medals over the White House fence, Ayers threw bombs that exploded. This is the support that Obama has elicited.

How Obama, McCain, Bush, Congress, and the Federal Reserve Benefit Egypt

While the House of Representatives adopted a wide ranging intrusion into the nation’s beleaguered financial sector, it is instructive to see how the bailout--and why exactly are we having a bailout?--plays out in the rest of the world.

Let us take a glance at Egypt, a nation with a heavy cash-based economy and relatively nascent set of financial tools, which should, in theory, provide haven from the “credit freeze” afflicting developed markets. Nonetheless, if not passed even in Egypt a financial crisis might occur, not without reason is this period best described as “global.” For with every advance in online communication, trading, banking and asset management, the flow of capital from one state to another is eased. In fact, the problem for Egypt and other foreign markets is that when outsiders panic, they aren’t just yanking cash out of their own markets, they disinvest elsewhere also.

The odd thing of course is that Candidate A is running against Candidate B--supposedly--yet both candidates come running to vote in support with the President, I suppose I should describe him as President B, further, the bailout was supported by all three and the Treasury Secretary and Federal Reserve Chairman. It seems like just about everyone favors the bill.

But wait, did the American taxpayers? Well, no, polls last week showed that less than 3 in 10 Americans supported the bailout.

I guess they don't count in this financial lovefeast between President B, Candidate A, and Candidate B.

At one time Republicans would have viewed the bailout as an abandonement of their small-government, free-market ideology that was once the cornerstone of their party’s economic ethos. Democrats at one time would not have wanted to use the little person's money to rescue the big money Wall Street megalomaniacs who drove the economy into the current mess in the first place. No more I take it.

Oh yes, and where does the bailout leave Egypt? Left to its out devices, the Egyptian economy is weak. Because of Egypt’s high poverty rates, and record inflation, Moody’s Investor Service lowered their rating on Egypt’s foreign currency country ceilings for bonds and bank deposits from stable to negative and downgraded the government’s local currency bond rating in July.

And as the past few weeks have shown, each bank collapse or whisper of impending economic chaos in the U.S. ties up nervous American investors-—a primary source of investment in Egypt—-who pull out of emerging markets as they try to recoup losses at home.

Egypt was bracing for Eid El-Fitr, which is a Muslim holiday that marks the end of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting, and Armed Forces Day, so the American setback would be delayed in Egypt. But, once markets re-open on 7 October, Egyptians can rejoice, Candidates A, B, and President B, along with the U.S. Congress, as well as the financial tentacles of the U.S. government, will have helped them.

Only the American taxpayer will suffer from the bailout.

Note on Bergen, The Osama bin Laden I Know

I'll admit it, this was a book I did not get around to reading at first because of its style and a misunderstanding of the book's purpose. The style of the book is difficult in that it is a series of excerpts, often overlapping, of diverse sources. The players are difficult to keep track of, but they need to be introduced time after time. Thus, we are constantly being reminded of who was bin Laden's bodyguard, which player this guy is, and how they fit into the organization.

Despite its limitations, the book is a fascinating read, and excerpted by those who knew or met bin Laden personally throughout the years. Where else are you going to find detailed information such as in one visitor to bin Laden's hangout, two of bin Laden's sons were playing Nintendo while hiding out with their infamous father?

But most importantly, Bergen is one of those rare journalists who allows bin Laden to be bin Laden, without the distortions or biases built in many other sources. Although the book suffers from a lack of cogent analysis, and that has been done elsewhere by Michael Scheuer particularly, Bergen's work is valuable read in that an accurate oral history emerges from the text to reveal a bin Laden who is unremarkable in some respects, absolutely lethal, and a worthy adversary of the U.S. In addition, since he is engaged in religious war, and a typical product of Islam, the West should realize that more bin Laden's are going to follow his lead, regardless of the presence of Al-Qaeda, or the life of bin Laden.