Marxist History in U.S. High Schools

Griff Jenkins interviewed radical Marxist-La Raza high school history teacher Ron Gochez from Los Angeles who called for a race revolution in the United States. Back in 2007 Gochez called for war against the imperialist-capitalist white race in an angry speech on the UCLA campus:

“We are revolutionary Mexican organization here. We understand that this is not just about Mexico. It’s about a global struggle against imperialism and capitalism… At the forefront of this revolutionary movement is La Raza (the race). We will no longer fall for these lies called borders. We see America as a northern front of a revolutionary movement… Our enemy is capitalism and imperialism.”

In Griff’s interview Gochez admits, “I am against capitalism.”

TERRORISTS CROSSING MEXICAN-U.S. BORDER

"Islamic United States will be an introduction to the formation of the global village"

Iranian cleric urges creation of 'Greater Iran'; caliphate would rule Middle East, central Asia.

Google Says It Mistakenly Collected Data on Web Usage

Google Says It Mistakenly Collected Data on Web Usage.

FRANKS & JASSER: American Muslims disagree

Islamist advocate's message won't resonate here.

Feds tell court they can decide what you eat

'Plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish.'

U.S. Joins U.N. Group Whose Stated Goal Is Anti-Israel, Pro-Islam

U.S. Joins U.N. Initiative Whose Stated Goal Is to Bridge Islam-West Divide

The Federal Fat Police

Bill Would Require Government to Track Body Mass of American Children

Jewish rights group says Arizona law not Nazi Though Catholic Archbishop Says So

Jewish rights group says Arizona law not Nazi.

Barackside from Scotland

David Horowitz vs. Anti-Semitic Muslim

David Horowitz at UCSD 5/10/2010

David Horowitz from the Freedom Center asking a Muslim student activist at UC San Diego if she supports Hizbullah's aim of eradicating Jewry from the face of the planet.

Obama Chickens

When the Public Servants Knock on Your Door: Public Servant Questionnaire

Public Servant Questionnaire

Many have reported that because of the mountain of statutory rules/regulations that have been passed over the last years government agency representatives have become increasingly more intrusive and/or abusive.

There is a public servant questionnaire that wise and informed people have been using when representatives from government agencies come knocking on their door or walk up to them in their yard. Handing the government representative this questionnaire and requesting they fill it out before you consider their request/demand (or let them in your house) can halt a difficult encounter before it begins.

This questionnaire requires they provide the information necessary to actually hold them personally accountable for their interactions.

When you hand the agency representative the form, be polite and tell them the form is a safeguard and a reassurance that they are not an imposter. Always be polite as the purpose of the form is to avoid an unpleasant encounter (and an unlawful intrusion) if possible – not create an escalating incident. The information they put on the form can help make a case that their actions are legal – but not lawful under state Constitutions. After all, we are living in a legal duality.

Cf. http://anticorruptionsociety.com/about/public-servant-questionnaire/

PUBLIC SERVANT'S QUESTIONNAIRE
Public Law 93-579 states in part: "The purpose of this Act is to provide certain
safeguards for an individual against invasion of personal privacy by requiring Federal
agencies...to permit and individual to determine what records pertaining to him are
collected, maintained, used, or disseminated by such agencies." The following questions
are based upon that act and are necessary in order that this individual may make a
reasonable determination concerning divulgence of information to this agency.

Fill out the form completely. If any question does not apply, mark the answer with N/A
or Not applicable. Do not leave any question blank.

Public Servant Information
1. Full Legal Name:
__________________________________________________________
2. Residence Address
__________________________________________________________
City __________________________State _______ Zip ____________
Department Information
3. Name of department, bureau, or agency by which public servant is employed:
__________________________________________________________
City __________________________State _______ Zip ____________
Supervisor's name:
__________________________________________________________
4. Mailing address
__________________________________________________________
City __________________________State _______ Zip ____________
Public Servant Duty
5. Will public servant uphold the Constitution of the United States?
__________________________________________________________
6. Did public servant furnish proof of identity?
__________________________________________________________
7. What was the nature of proof?
__________________________________________________________
8. Will public servant furnish a copy of the law or regulation which authorizes this
investigation?
__________________________________________________________
9. Will the public servant read aloud the portion of the law authorizing the questions they will ask?
__________________________________________________________
Nature of Investigation
10. Are the answers to the questions voluntary or mandatory?
__________________________________________________________
11. Are the questions to be asked based upon a specific law/regulation, or are they being
used as a discovery process?
__________________________________________________________
12. What other uses may be made of this information?
__________________________________________________________
13. What other agencies may have access to this information?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
14. What will be the effect upon me if I should choose not to answer any part or all of
these questions?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Basis for Investigation
15. Name of person in government requesting that this investigation be made.
__________________________________________________________
16. Is this investigation 'general' or is it 'special'?
__________________________________________________________
17. Have you consulted, questioned, interviewed, or received information from any third
party relative to this investigation?
__________________________________________________________
18. If so, the identity of such third parties:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Expected Results of Investigation
19. Do you reasonably anticipate either a civil or criminal action to be initiated or
pursued based upon any of the requested information?
__________________________________________________________
Agency Information
20. Is there a file of records, information, or correspondence relating to me being
maintained by this agency? ______________ If yes, which?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
21. Is this agency using any information pertaining to me which was supplied by another
agency or government source?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
22. May I have a copy of that information? ______________ If not, why not?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
If so, how may I obtain a copy of that information?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
23. Will the public servant guarantee that the information in these files will not be used
by any department other than the one by whom he is employed? __________
If not, why not?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Affirmation
If any request for information relating to me is received from any person or agency, you
must advise me in writing before releasing such information. Failure to do so may subject
you to possible civil or criminal action as provided by the act.
I swear (affirm) that the answers I have given to the foregoing questions are complete and
correct in every particular.
Printed name: ___________________________________________________
Signature: ___________________________________________________
Date: ________(month)_________(day)___________________(year)
First Witness Printed Name: ________________________________________
First Witness Signature: ________________________________________
Second Witness Printed Name: ______________________________________
Second Witness Signature: ________________________________________

Authorities for Questions:

1,2,3,4 In order to be sure you know exactly who you are giving the information to. Residence and business addresses are needed in case you need to serve process in a civil or criminal action upon this individual.
5 All public servants have taken a sworn oath to uphold and defend the constitution.
6,7 This is standard procedure by government agents and officers. See Internal Revenue Manual, MT-9900-26, Section 242.133.
8,9,10 Title 5 USC 552a, paragraph (e) (3) (A)
11 Title 5 USC 552a, paragraph (d) (5), (e) (1)
12,13 Title 5 USC 552a, paragraph (e) (3) (B), (e) (3) (C)
14 Title 5 USC 552a, paragraph (e) (3) (D)
15 Public Law 93-579 (b) (1)
16 Title 5 USC 552a, paragraph (e) (3) (A)
17,18 Title 5 USC 552a, paragraph (e) (2)
19 Title 5 USC 552a, paragraph (d) (5)
20,21 Public Law 93-579 (b) (1)
22 Title 5 USC 552a, paragraph (d) (1)
23 Title 5 USC 552a, paragraph (e) (10)

The Story

The Decline

The Ad

I Need A Freakin Job @ Yahoo! Video

Rule of Law Superfluous in Regime: Allegation of White House Bribe Ignored

Rep. Darrell Issa, the ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, slammed Attorney General Eric Holder Thursday for his refusal to investigate (D-PA) allegations the White House attempted to bribe Rep. Joe Sestak into withdrawing from Pennsylvania’s Democratic Primary for the U.S. Senate in exchange for a high ranking federal job.

1. Title 18, U.S.C. Section 211 says, “Whoever solicits or receives, either as a political contribution or for personal emolument, any money or thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year or both.”

2. Title 18, U.S.C. Section 595, which says, “Whoever, being a person employed in any administrative position by the United States … uses his official authority for the purposes of interfering with, or affecting the nomination of, or the election of any candidate for office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representative…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

3. Finally, Issa referred to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 600, which says, “Whoever directly or indirectly promises any employment position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, in favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.”

Update on American "Power" Bill to be Noted

Kerry-Lieberman have attempted to slip the bill in before the upcoming November slaughter in the wake of the huge oil spill in the Gulf.

Texas Taxpayers Fund Racist Machete Film

Robert Rodriguez’ racist film ‘Machete‘ was made, in part, with help from tax incentives and location access provided by the Texas Film Commission. A spokesperson from the organization confirmed that Rodriguez indeed applied for the program and that all of his Troublemaker Studios films have been part of it.

Holder Defends Islam

Rep. Smith to Holder: The Administration's policies make America less safe

May 13, 2010 — In testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on 5/13/2010, US Attorney General avoids the term "radical Islam."

Holder hasn't read Arizona law he criticized

The Attorney General tells Jake Tapper on a Sunday Talk show, taped 9 May, that he worries the Arizona bill will lead to profiling and cause people not to cooperate with police.

Holder hasn't read Arizona law he criticized. Isn't it prejudice if you judge someone before knowing the facts?

This is a video excerpt from 13 May on C-SPAN's coverage of Congressman Ted Poe (R-TX) questioning Attorney General Eric Holder about his knowledge of Arizona Senate Bill 1070 (commonly known as the Arizona Immigration Law).

Based on the media coverage of the protests, the Obama administration has indicated it may file a federal lawsuit against Arizona to block the law. On Thursday, Congressman Ted Poe (R-Texas) of the House Judiciary Committee questioned U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder about the administration's plans regarding the controversial law.

Poe: "The law is supported by 70 percent of the people in Arizona, 60 percent of all Americans, and 50 percent of all Hispanics, according to the Wall Street Journal/NBC poll done just this week. And I understand that you may file a lawsuit against the law. It seems to me the administration ought to be enforcing border security and immigration laws and not challenge them, and that the administration is on the wrong side of the American people. Have you read the Arizona law?"

Holder: "I have not had a chance...I've glanced at it, I have not read it...."

Poe: "It's ten pages. It's a lot shorter than the healthcare bill, which was 2,000 pages long. I'll give you my copy of it if you'd like to have a copy. Even though you haven't read the law, do you have an opinion as to whether it's constitutional?"

Holder: "I've not been briefed yet. We, as I've said, have had under way a review of the law. I have not been briefed by the people who are responsible for that review."

Poe: "When do you think you will have an opinion as to whether the law is constitutional?"

Holder: "I've used this term a lot, but I think this is accurate: relatively soon. I think that we have to...there has been much discussion about this...."

Poe: "It's hard for me to understand how you would have concerns about something being unconstitutional if you haven't even read the law. It seems like you wouldn't make a judgment about whether it violates civil rights statutes...if you haven't read the law. So can you help me out there a little bit, how you can make a judgment call on that but you haven't read the law and determined whether it's constitutional or not?"

Holder: "What I've said is that I've not made up my mind. I've only made the comments that I've made on the basis of things that I've been able to glean by reading newspaper accounts...television...talking to people who are on the review team looking at the law. But I've not reached any conclusions yet...I've just expressed concerns on the basis of what I've heard about the law."

http://www.onenewsnow.com/AP/Search/US/Default.aspx?id=1012992

Medals for Wimps

Hold fire, earn a medal