"You said he was responsible for these things? Is there going to be any evidence presented? ... Do you not see at all, does the Administration not see at all how a President asserting that he has the right to kill an American citizen without due process, and that he's not going to even explain why he thinks he has that right, is troublesome to some people?"
Good thing no Americans are being referred to as barbarians or extremists so we never have to worry about a WH spokesperson announcing that with no evidence another American has been ordered killed by the president: no Constitutional issue here kids, move along, nothing to see here.
Secret U.S. memo sanctioned killing of Aulaqi
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
How was al-AwLaki deprived of life with due process?
Posts
