Burning America: The Reagan Revolution or Who Was the Son of Reagan? Too Little, Too Late
https://www.popai.pro/share.html?shareKey=bb766a93834a80b9985076901572b2b4e8821ad74f305f7d02b207ae0426dc4b&utm_source=presentationsharepage
The most startling aspect of the Reagan Revolution is that, by hindsight, it was only a whimper. For the entire generation of Reagan followers whom he inspired, no one has emerged, nor has any conservative had a long-lasting cultural reversal resulting from the Reagan years. Reagan is the failed revolutionary.
Nonetheless, there are positive developments, which are to the President's credit. Ronald Reagan restored the office of the presidency to its place of prominence through policies that fostered a productive economy and that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union and an end to the Cold War.
Ronald Reagan pursued what Frank Meyer called Fusionism as he attempted to combine many of the leading intellectual movements on the right: social and economic libertarianism, neoconservative interventionism, and traditionalism.
Unfortunately, some of Reagan's policies were not helpful to the country.
• Several of Reagan’s policies fit within the neoliberal consensus as he:
o reduced antitrust prosecutions.
o supported global free trade.
o signed the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, which legalized millions of illegal immigrants and did not punish businesses for hiring illegals.
After the disaster of the Carter administration many people sought a return to normalcy after both the impeachment of Richard Nixon and the failed administration of Jimmy Carter. Ronald Reagan restored the office of the presidency to its place of prominence through policies that fostered a productive economy and that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union and an end to the Cold War.
Unfortunately, the neoliberal consensus doomed Reagan to be an example of too little, too late. No centrist, Constitutionalist candidate emerged from the Reagan Revolution as the left-wing marched through American culture while cultural and institutional decline occurred.
The radical march through the institutions was heralded by Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Marxist, who coined the phrase “the long march through the institutions” to explain how a minority could change society by taking over key institutions in education and bureaucracy.
Radicals followed Gramsci’s model by co-opting Great Society programs, ensconcing themselves in the education system, taking over the bureaucratic agencies created by the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and modifying administrative law. Radicals transformed civil rights justice into progressive equity, diversity, and inclusion programs which downplayed talent and achievement by the most deserving and hard working individuals.
Radicals began to attack the “hidden curriculum” in public schools and weed out what radicals claimed were the racist, sexist, Christian, and homophobic ideas prevalent in school curricula
Activist teachers raised the consciousness of students to indoctrinate them into an awareness of a supposed Pablo Freire-like oppression to enlist children in the battle against reactionary forces.
Radicals in bureaucracy and education published authoritative documents on systemic racism and endorsed antiracist activities for school children. These activities divided students into privileged and oppressed groups in order to institute equity privileged individuals.
Unfortunately, the Reagan Era produced a son. Barack Obama became the poster child of affirmative action during this radical period in American education that began with college indoctrination but has since moved into the primary grades.
Obama’s early political career was launched in the living room of Bill Ayers, a far-left militant organizer and founder of the Weather Underground. This connection, along with others to controversial figures such as the anti-Semitic Palestinian academic Rashid Khalidi, Jeremiah "God Damn America" Wright, and Critical Race Theory pioneer Derrick Bell, paints a picture of a president influenced by extreme Leftist ideologies from the very start. Critical legal theory was itself a takeoff on critical theory, a philosophical approach originating out of the leftist Frankfurt School.
Jeremiah "God Damn America" Wright:
https://youtu.be/UnlRrxXv-v8?si=YXuGIkdyOxUAwSx2
Agitator Obama Speaks To Harvard Students Supporting Critical Race Theorist Derrick Bell
https://youtu.be/1_XphrCKvKE?si=v-JG2R3f8L_ZMaah
Obama learned about sex from a Communist.
Frank Marshall Davis was the subject of a 600 page FBI file. Davis was not only a Communist Party USA member, but engaged in activities considered suspicious by the FBI, such as photographing the Hawaii coast, possibly for espionage purposes. Davis was on the FBI’s “security index” of dangerous people. He also wrote a semi-autobiographical pornographic novel under a pseudonym entitled "Sex Rebel: Black." The author describes it more directly as a “complete sex autobiography…” It appears that Davis was part of a “free love” movement, someone who by the author’s admission “specialized in sex,” even with children. Davis was Obama’s mentor for about eight or nine years. Then Obama went off to Occidental College, where classmate John C. Drew says the future president was already a committed Marxist.
"To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully, " Obama wrote in his memoir, "Dreams From My Father." "the more politically active black students. The foreign students. The chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists" (p. 100).
Obama’s point: I am a radical leftist. During my college years: 1979–1983; I am developing my radical views.
- 1979 – The Iran hostage crisis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis) begins. In the aftermath, a second energy crisis develops, tripling the price of oil (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_of_oil) and sending U. S. gasoline prices over $1 per gallon for the first time.
- Once in office, I will send cash to Iran.
- 1980 – The United States (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States) boycotts the Summer Olympics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summer_Olympics) in Moscow (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow) to protest the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Afghanistan); also announces a grain embargo against the Soviet Union with the support of the European Commission.
- I will mock presidential candidate Mitt Romney for having anti-Soviet policies left over from the 1980s.
- 1980 – The Refugee Act (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugee_Act) is signed into law, reforming United States immigration law and admitted refugees on systematic basis for humanitarian reasons
- I will exploit the Act for an open Southern border and encourage Biden to do the same during my Third Term.
- 1981 Obama visits Pakistan with his boyfriend.
- 1983 – 241 U.S. Marines (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Marine_Corps) are killed by a suicide bomb in Lebanon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebanon).
- I will come into office with only two kinetic conflicts and commit blood and treasure in seven Middle Eastern countries to feed the military-industrial complex.
- 1984 – The drug problem intensifies as crack (a smokable form of cocaine) is first introduced into the Los Angeles area.
- I will increase inner city dependence on drugs, crime, public assistance, and poor education to increase misery.
Albert Shanker, President of the American Federation of Teachers, testified before Congress that many of these programs encouraged students to become violent and to resist all authority as oppression.
Many antiracism activities taught that all white people are racists regardless of whether they have any conscious racial prejudice.
Antiracist training activities also pushed Pat Bidol’s new definition of racism as the combination of power and prejudice. In Bidol’s teaching, this meant that only groups with power can be oppressors.
Schools also urged white students to confess their privilege so they can become allies for the underprivileged.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibited overt acts of discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, and national origin. It barred the use of racial quotas.
Radicals, however, took over the agencies created by Congress to enforce the law and began interpreting the law contrary to its own language.
The federal courts often deferred to the expertise of equity and diversity bureaucrats as laid out in a labyrinth of interpretive memos, clarifications, and guidelines.
Congress began delegating authority to agencies—for example, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission—to prosecute violations.
In 1978, agencies adopted the four-fifths rule, which introduced quotas for race, sex, and ethnicity as de facto evidence of discrimination.
Bureaucracies themselves grew under radical leadership in terms of budget and personnel, even though federal hiring standards often had to be lowered to allow more minority hires in federal agencies.
Radicals extended the preferential treatment and entitlements afforded to African Americans under Civil Rights law to new victim groups: women, Hispanics, Asians, Indians, the elderly, the disabled, and homosexuals.
Radicals Transform Administrative Law
Liberal regulatory agencies were intended to regulate and protect private industry for the public interest.
Radicals rejected the idea of public interest and insisted that there was only the distinct interest of various groups.
o These groups included civil rights groups, environmentalist groups, consumer protection groups, and worker health and safety groups.
o Elites were now able to claim to represent various unorganized and underrepresented groups.
Property rights were also extended to include rights to welfare in order to protect those who now were receiving government aid.
Congress began to approach each new issue by creating an agency and granting it broad powers to set economy-wide standards.
o These included the Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the Consumer Product Safety Administration.
o Most of these agencies were primarily staffed by lawyers, not scientific experts in the respective field.
Late-1988 to mid-1989
During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university official about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN.
http://thekansascitian.blogspot.com/search?q=Obama+Accused+Of+Sexual+Harassment
The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.
Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review from late-1988 to mid-1989. THE KANSAS CITIAN learned of the allegations against him, and over the course of several weeks, has put together accounts of what happened by talking to a lengthy roster of former university officials, current and past students and others familiar with the workings of the journal at the time Obama was there.
In one case, THE KANSAS CITIAN has seen documentation describing the allegations and showing that the university formally resolved the matter. Both men received separation packages that were in the five-figure range.
On the details of Obama’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two men, THE KANSAS CITIAN has a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints.
The sources — including the recollections of close associates and other documentation — describe episodes that left the men upset and offended. These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature, taking place at hotels during conferences, at other officially sanctioned journal events and at the journal’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made men who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.
The White House spokesperson did not deny nor offer additional details about the abuse.
Foreign Policy
"They [the Chinese among others] may well assume, as a result of Obama's early actions and international conversation, that the present government of the United States either would not object to these measures [Chinese aggression] or would do nothing concrete to stop them--or perhaps even privately sympathizes with their particular grievances against the Western-inspired world order" (p. 7).
How The Obama Administration Threatens Our National Security by Victor Davis Hanson, Encounter Books (2009).Obama's apology tour in 2009 negatively impacted the view of America in the eyes of the world.
The election of Obama in 2008 was America's Alaric moment. Alaric was infamous for sacking Rome in 410 AD, an event often seen as symbolic of the decline of the Western Roman Empire. Obama lacked the qualifications for the high office of president, given his lack of experience as a State Senator and as a Senator. As a State Senator, he was criticized for voting "present" on numerous controversial bills, such as promoting abortion, gun control, and criminal justice reform. His lack of decision-making and clarity on important issues made him singularly unqualified for advancement. Thereafter, he supported the renewal of the Patriot Act, which, in a bipartisan effort, expanded the government's surveillance and counterterrorism powers. Civil liberties advocates noted that the law violated the Constitutional rights of Americans.
Nonetheless, on the specious premise of "hope and change," the American people embraced Barack as the savior to solve the race problem in US history. Obama, ever the 1960s-style race agitator, committed a serious misstep on race early on during his presidency. For example, the "beer summit" in July 2009, where Obama sat down with his friend Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. and the officer who arrested him, Sergeant James Crowley, who was performing a routine police patrol. In this instance, a president took a clear stance by wading into a local police matter and favored his pal Gates when he called the arrest "stupid." The police were disrespected in this instance and anticipated later serious racial matters during the George Floyd incident. Obama set a trend, by engaging in such a public back-and-forth with a police officer, which could embolden those who criticize law enforcement without understanding the challenges they face. Identify politics grew exponentially after an incident such as the summit. None of Sergeant Crowley's peers identified him with racism precious to the Gates incident, and Obama's summit undermined police morale and public trust in law enforcement.
Obama's presidency was marked by significant controversies and criticisms regarding his handling of constitutional powers and adherence to the rule of law.
Some specific examples include Obama's use of executive action to bypass Congress and enact policy changes, such as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which many argued was an overreach of his authority. Additionally, Obama's administration faced scrutiny for its use of surveillance programs, such as the National Security Agency's bulk data collection, which critics argued violated citizens' Fourth Amendment rights to privacy. Furthermore, Obama's administration was criticized for its handling of the Affordable Care Act, with accusations that it violated the Constitution's Origination Clause by originating in the Senate instead of the House of Representatives (Ermakoff, 2020).
Source: This paper will examine these criticisms by comparing Bush and Obama's constitutional power claims and actions in the areas of war powers, signing statements, and veto power (Spitzer, 2012).
Examining Constitutional Power Claims
When comparing Obama's constitutional power claims and actions to those of his predecessor, George W. Bush, it becomes evident that Obama pushed the boundaries of executive authority and engaged in actions that were deemed unconstitutional (Spitzer, 2012).
Ermakoff, I. (2020, October 1). Law against the Rule of Law: Assaulting Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12253
Spitzer, R J. (2012, January 1). Comparing the Constitutional Presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama: War Powers, Signing Statements, and Vetoes. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1980301