Starting at about 24:00 to about 39:00, by name, the Imam's sermon incites the congregation against activists who are are denouncing honor killings. He calls people out by name, describing them as a "bigot," etc. Thereafter, he equates "white, Christian, male" murderers as the same type as honor killings. He claims Islam has nothing to do with honor killings. Obama is credited with defending Islam against the military schools and the NYPD who are rightly attributing Islamism as the cause of terrorism. The Imam seeks to equate the Norway incident, that of Anders Behring Breivik, as the act of a Christian, and asks why the nineteen Islamists who attacked on 9/11 should be considered Muslims. This is simple. The Norway incident was not inspired by Christ; the 9/11 attackers killed for Islamism. They should not be equated.
Video streaming by Ustream
According to sharia, Islamic law, honor killings are acceptable.
The scanned text is from one of the most important English-language sources for the content of Islamic law: Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law. It is certified by Al-Azhar University as a translation that "corresponds to the Arabic original and conforms to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni Community..."
In Book O, titled "Justice," in section 1, "Who is Subject to Retaliation for Injurious Crimes," section o1.1 reads, "Retaliation is obligatory ... against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right..."
However, o1.2 clarifies (above) that "The following are not subject to retaliation" and then lists — after the lovely, egalitarian "Muslim for killing a non-Muslim" and "Jewish or Christian subject ... for killing an apostate" — "(4) a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring."
Christianity (cf. Wikipedia)
In 2009, Anders Behring Breivik wrote "Today's Protestant church is a joke. Priests in jeans who march for Palestine and churches that look like minimalist shopping centres. I am a supporter of an indirect collective conversion of the Protestant church back to the Catholic."[168] On his Facebook profile, Breivik described himself as a Christian,[32] though he is critical of the Catholic and Protestant churches, objecting to their "current suicidal path". Before the attacks, he stated an intention to attend Frogner Church in a final "Martyr's mass".[169]
The manifesto states its author is "100 percent Christian",[3] but he is not "excessively religious"[3] and considers himself a "cultural Christian" and a "modern-day crusader".[2][3] His manifesto states "I'm not going to pretend I'm a very religious person, as that would be a lie", calls religion a crutch and a source for drawing mental strength, and says "I've always been very pragmatic and influenced by my secular surroundings and environment"; regarding the term "cultural Christian" which he says means preserving European culture, he notes "It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian-atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian cultural legacy...)"[160][2] Furthermore, Breivik stated that "myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christand God."[2][170] Nevertheless, he stated that he planned to pray to God seeking for his help during his attacks.[171]
Breivik condemns Pope Benedict XVI for his dialogue with Islam: "Pope Benedict has abandoned Christianity and all Christian Europeans and is to be considered a cowardly, incompetent, corrupt and illegitimate Pope." It will thus be necessary, writes Breivik, to overthrow the Protestant and Catholic hierarchies, after which a "Great Christian Congress" would set up a new European Church.[172] He has also condemned Christian missionary activity in India as it would lead to the "total destruction of theHindu faith and culture", and he expresses support for the Hindutva movement against Indian Communist movements.[173]
American Christian press has also highlighted that Breivik appears to have addressed followers of the Neopagan religion of Odinism in his writ. In regards to them, he says, "even Odinists can fight with us or by our side as brothers" in the Knights Templar organization of which Breivik claims to be a founding member. He later says to reject Odinism, saying that the Thor's Hammer cannot unify the people of Europe, but that the Christian cross will.[174]
Deputy police chief Roger Andresen initially told reporters that information on Breivik's websites was "so to speak, Christian fundamentalist".[68][175][176][177] Subsequently, others have disputed Andresen's characterisation of Breivik as a Christian fundamentalist.[172][178] Rev. Olav Fykse Tveit, head of the World Council of Churches and himself Norwegian, accused Breivik of blasphemy for citing Christianity as a justification in his murderous attack.[2][179]
Posts
