http://video.foxnews.com/v/1244953787001/catholic-university-under-attack/?playlist_id=86924
So let me get this straight. I am supposed to feel better about the accusation because an activist anti-Catholic attorney can file a frivolous lawsuit and activist anti-Catholic judges will seriously entertain the motion while CUA must pay private counsel to combat the taxpayer (including Roman Catholics) supported D.C. Office of Human Rights?
Isn't anti-Catholic bigotry, as any prejudice, simply offensive to civil discourse and should be condemned on that basis?
The crux of the issue is to see through the human rights smokescreen which obscures religious First Amendment natural rights.
The distinction between human rights and natural rights deriving inalienably from the Creator is not apparent. There are those that must believe promoting Islamist issues will find a hearing and will be considered seriously.
I do not feel any better after all.
Get ready.